Rights reclamation.

According to a rights forfeiture theory of punishment, liability to punishment hinges upon the notion that criminals forfeit their rights against hard treatment. In this paper, I assume the success of rights forfeiture theory in establishing the permissibility of punishment but aim to develop the vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 181; no. 4; pp. 835 - 859
Autor principal: Bell, William L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Apr2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=176582953&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 176582953
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2024
      vid: 181
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176582953
        10.1007/s11098-024-02132-8
      ppf: 835
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 868KB
      tig:
        atl: Rights reclamation.
      aug:
        au: Bell, William L.
        affil: https://ror.org/01yc7t268 Department of Philosophy, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, 63130, St. Louis, MO, USA
      su:
        Forfeiture
        Punishment
        Pluralism
        Criminal intent
        Criminal law
      sug:
        subj:
          Forfeiture
          Punishment
          Pluralism
          Criminal intent
          Criminal law
      keyword:
        Compensation
        Mens rea
        Rights forfeiture
        Rights reclamation
      ab: According to a rights forfeiture theory of punishment, liability to punishment hinges upon the notion that criminals forfeit their rights against hard treatment. In this paper, I assume the success of rights forfeiture theory in establishing the permissibility of punishment but aim to develop the view by considering how forfeited rights might be reclaimed. Built into the very notion of proportionate punishment is the idea that forfeited rights can be recovered. The interesting question is whether punishment is the sole means for reclaiming forfeited rights. I argue for a pluralistic theory of rights reclamation, according to which, there are multiple ways by which a wrongdoer can recapture her forfeited rights. In particular, I argue that offering remorseful compensation is a valid means by which a wrongdoer might partially, or fully, reclaim her right against punishment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N