Collaborative sustainability planning for an outcome measure in outpatient stroke rehabilitation: A qualitative description study.
Rationale: Evidence suggests that sustainability planning and the use of a collaborative approach to planning result in better sustainability outcomes and more relevant knowledge. Yet, both approaches appear to be underutilized. A detailed description of collaborative sustainability planning may enc...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 459 - 473 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176649344&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 176649344 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13561294 EV1 jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice issn: 13561294 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2024 vid: 30 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 176649344 176649344 176649344 10.1111/jep.13963 176649344 ppf: 459 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Collaborative sustainability planning for an outcome measure in outpatient stroke rehabilitation: A qualitative description study. aug: au: Ataman, Rebecca Ahmed, Sara Berta, Whitney Thomas, Aliki affil: School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal Québec,, Canada sug: subj: Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome Assessment Outpatient Service Collaboration Strategic Planning Implementation Science Human Qualitative Studies Descriptive Research Meetings Thematic Analysis Health Services Accessibility Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Program Evaluation Male Female Funding Source Male Female ab: Rationale: Evidence suggests that sustainability planning and the use of a collaborative approach to planning result in better sustainability outcomes and more relevant knowledge. Yet, both approaches appear to be underutilized. A detailed description of collaborative sustainability planning may encourage the use of these two impactful strategies. Aims and Objectives: To explore the collaborative sustainability planning process for a single outcome measure in three rehabilitation sites. Methodology: Within the Mayo‐Portland Adaptability Inventory—version 4 (MPAI‐4) implementation project, we conducted a qualitative description study. We used data from 12 core sustainability planning meetings and 108 follow‐up meetings that included a total of 31 clinical and research team participants. Sustainability planning was informed by an MPAI‐4‐specific implementation guide, and by the results from a realist review of the sustainability of rehabilitation practices and the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool. We analyzed qualitative data using thematic content analysis. Results: Three themes describe the collaborative sustainability planning process: (1) "collaboration as a driver for sustainability" which captures the active collaboration underpinning sustainability planning; (2) "co‐creation of a sustainability plan to achieve shared objectives" which captures the identified barriers and facilitators, and selected sustainability strategies linked to one of six collaboratively identified shared objectives; and (3) "the iterative nature of sustainability planning" which captures the necessity of an agile and responsive sustainability planning process. Conclusion: Identified strategies may be useful to support (collaborative) sustainment. Future research could investigate the effect of collaborative sustainability planning on sustainability objectives, and the relationship between these objectives. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|