(De)Centering Whiteness through community dialogues about safety problems and solutions.
What happens to problem‐solution pathways when racism is prominent in a public policy issue and a group of stakeholders—the majority of whom are White—dialogue about desired policy changes? I examine this question through a case study of community dialogues about policing, safety, race, and White pr...
| Publicado en: | Public Administration Review Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 465 - 484 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
May2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=176813043&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 176813043 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00333352 PBA jtl: Public Administration Review issn: 00333352 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2024 vid: 84 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 176813043 10.1111/puar.13793 ppf: 465 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 554KB tig: atl: (De)Centering Whiteness through community dialogues about safety problems and solutions. aug: au: Quick, Kathryn S. affil: Hubert Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Minnesota, , USA su: Anti-racism White privilege Ethnographic analysis Race Government policy Police reform sug: subj: Anti-racism White privilege Ethnographic analysis Race Government policy Police reform ab: What happens to problem‐solution pathways when racism is prominent in a public policy issue and a group of stakeholders—the majority of whom are White—dialogue about desired policy changes? I examine this question through a case study of community dialogues about policing, safety, race, and White privilege after Philando Castile was killed by a police officer. Through longitudinal, ethnographic analysis, I trace how a series of deliberative dialogues made White complicity in racism visible, leading to problem‐solution pathways expanding beyond an initial focus on policing reform to also incorporate White residents' making deeper commitments to anti‐racism and inclusion. This shift occurred through the sequencing of topics, slowing down the pace of problem definition, building relationships, dialogue norms and facilitation methodologies, and BIPOC participants' labor. I conclude with suggestions for more constructive democratic processes to support anti‐racist governance. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|