The experience of shared decision‐making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.
Objectives: To identify, describe and synthesise the views and experiences of adults living with asthma regarding shared decision‐making (SDM) in the existing qualitative literature Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of 10 databases (list databases) from inception until September 2023. Scr...
| Publicado en: | Health Expectations Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 1 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Apr2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=176869875&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 176869875 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13696513 EVY jtl: Health Expectations issn: 13696513 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2024 vid: 27 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 176869875 176869875 176869875 10.1111/hex.14039 176869875 ppf: 1 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: The experience of shared decision‐making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. aug: au: Kang, Hui‐qi Peng, Yueming He, Yuanyuan Yang, Xiufen Su, Jin Yang, Qiaohong Luo, Weixiang affil: Jinan University, Tianhe District, Guangzhou city Guangdong Province,, China sug: subj: Patient Attitudes Evaluation Attitude to Illness Evaluation Decision Making, Shared Asthma Therapy Human Systematic Review Meta Synthesis Conceptual Framework Checklists Thematic Analysis Motivation PubMed Medline Embase CINAHL Database Cochrane Library Psycinfo Life Style Self-Efficacy Physician-Patient Relations Information Resources Patient Centered Care Medical Care Male Female Adolescence Adult Funding Source Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: Objectives: To identify, describe and synthesise the views and experiences of adults living with asthma regarding shared decision‐making (SDM) in the existing qualitative literature Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of 10 databases (list databases) from inception until September 2023. Screening was performed according to inclusion criteria. Tools from the Joanna Briggs lnstitute were utilised for the purposes of data extraction and synthesis in this study. The data extraction process in this study employed the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM‐B model) as a framework, and a pragmatic meta‐aggregative approach was employed to synthesise the collected results. Results: Nineteen studies were included in the metasynthesis. Three synthesised themes were identified: the capability of people living with asthma, the opportunities of people living with asthma in SDM, and the motivation of the people living with asthma in SDM. Conclusions: We have identified specific factors influencing people living with asthma engaging in SDM. The findings of this study can serve as a basis for the implementation of SDM in people living with asthma and provide insights for the development of their SDM training programs. The ConQual score for the synthesised findings was rated as low. To enhance confidence, future studies should address dependability and credibility factors. Practice Implications: This review contemplates the implementation of SDM from the perspective of people living with asthma, with the aim of providing patient‐centred services for them. The results of this review can benefit the implementation of SDM and facilitate information sharing. It offers guidance for SDM skills training among adults living with asthma, fosters a better doctor–patient relationship and facilitates consensus in treatment decisions, thereby enabling personalised and tailored medical care. Patient or Public Contribution: Three nursing graduate students participated in the data extraction and integration process, with two students having extensive clinical experience that provided valuable insights for the integration. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts meta synthesis Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|