Power, Connection, and the Endless Present.
Published more than a decade ago, Paul Kramer's "Power and Connection: Imperial Histories of the United States in the World" is arguably the most important intervention in the field of U.S. and the World history. This roundtable affirms its standing among modern American historians. Yet the essay's...
| Publicado en: | Modern American History Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 163 - 168 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Interview |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Mar2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=176873327&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 176873327 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 25150456 LDQ8 jtl: Modern American History issn: 25150456 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2024 vid: 7 iid: 1 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 176873327 10.1017/mah.2023.42 ppf: 163 ppct: 5 formats: tig: atl: Power, Connection, and the Endless Present. aug: au: Irwin, Ryan affil: Department of History, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY, USA su: Civil rights movements Diplomatic history State power United States history World history sug: subj: Civil rights movements Diplomatic history State power United States history World history ab: Published more than a decade ago, Paul Kramer's "Power and Connection: Imperial Histories of the United States in the World" is arguably the most important intervention in the field of U.S. and the World history. This roundtable affirms its standing among modern American historians. Yet the essay's exact influence is hard to characterize. Classic state-of-the-field essays—like Charles Maier's broadside against U.S. diplomatic history or Jacquelyn Dowd Hall's invocation of a long civil rights movement—spurred field-wide reckonings. Kramer's impact was subtler. Recently, Daniel Bessner and Fredrik Logevall cited the essay to say that the field should revisit U.S. policy making, using "Power and Connection" as a foil to discuss the limits of the international and transnational turns. However, boosters of those turns—Erez Manela and Naoko Shibusawa, among others—ignore "Power and Connection," even as they advance claims about globalization and imperialism that touch on the article's arguments. This impasse is as fascinating—as worthy of exposition—as Kramer's original claims, partly because it invites us to historicize the decade just past. Rather than handling the essay with antiquarian gloves, I'd like to dig into this dirt to consider three questions: What did "Power and Connection" displace? What did it do? And how does the essay resonate in our present? pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Interview src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|