Mindreading Measures Misread? A Multimethod Investigation Into the Validity of Self-Report and Task-Based Approaches.

Mindreading ability—also referred to as cognitive empathy or mentalizing—is typically conceptualized as a relatively stable dimension of individual differences in the ability to make accurate inferences about the mental states of others. This construct is primarily assessed using self-report questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychological Assessment Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 365 - 379
Autores principales: Wendt, Leon P., Zimmermann, Johannes, Spitzer, Carsten, Müller, Sascha
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association May2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=176929741&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 176929741
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10403590
        POL
      jtl: Psychological Assessment
      issn: 10403590
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2024
      vid: 36
      iid: 5
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        176929741
        10.1037/pas0001310
      ppf: 365
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Mindreading Measures Misread? A Multimethod Investigation Into the Validity of Self-Report and Task-Based Approaches.
      aug:
        au:
          Wendt, Leon P.
          Zimmermann, Johannes
          Spitzer, Carsten
          Müller, Sascha
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, University of Kassel
          Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Rostock University Medical Center, University of Rostock
      su:
        Empathy
        Self-evaluation
        Task performance
        Cognition
        Descriptive statistics
        Structural equation modeling
        Research methodology
        Data analysis software
        Thought & thinking
      sug:
        subj:
          Empathy
          Self-evaluation
          Task performance
          Cognition
          Descriptive statistics
          Structural equation modeling
          Research methodology
          Data analysis software
          Thought & thinking
      keyword:
        cognitive empathy
        mentalizing
        self-report
        task performance
        validity
        cognitive empathy
        mentalizing
        self-report
        task performance
        validity
      ab: Mindreading ability—also referred to as cognitive empathy or mentalizing—is typically conceptualized as a relatively stable dimension of individual differences in the ability to make accurate inferences about the mental states of others. This construct is primarily assessed using self-report questionnaires and task-based performance measures. However, the validity of these measures has been questioned: According to rival interpretations, mindreading tasks may capture general cognitive ability, whereas mindreading self-reports may capture perceived rather than actual mindreading ability. In this preregistered multimethod study involving 700 participants from the U.S. general population, we tested the validity of mindreading measures by examining the nomological network of self-reports and task-based methods using structural equation modeling. Specifically, we contrasted the empirical associations with theoretical predictions that assume mindreading measures are valid versus invalid. More consistent with rival interpretations, mindreading tasks showed a negligible latent correlation with mindreading self-reports (.05) and a large one with general cognitive ability (.85), whereas mindreading self-reports were specifically associated with perceived performance in mindreading tasks (.29). Also more consistent with rival interpretations, neither mindreading self-reports nor task-based measures showed positive unique associations with psychosocial functioning when controlling for general cognitive ability and general positive self-evaluation. Instead, negative unique associations emerged for both methods, although this effect was not robust for tasks. Overall, the results cast doubt on the validity of commonly used mindreading measures and support their rival interpretations. Public Significance Statement: This study indicates that psychological tests designed to assess mindreading ability may lack validity in that mindreading tasks may largely capture general cognitive ability rather than specific mindreading ability, while self-report questionnaires on mindreading may primarily capture subjective self-perception.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N