Using Quality Improvement as a Mechanism for Fostering Partnerships and Promoting Equity in a Health System Change Model.

Purpose: Quality improvement (QI) processes provide a framework for systematically examining target outcomes and what changes can be made to result in improvement and ensure equity. We present a case study of how QI processes were used as a means of partnership building to enhance equity in designin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Maternal & Child Health Journal Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 984 - 990
Autores principales: Chandler, Caroline E., Louison, Laura, Madenyika, Nancy, Robertson, Nakenge, Hardy, Brie, Allin, Sarah, Kimberg, Dan, Fleming, W. Oscar
Formato: case study pictorial tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: Quality improvement (QI) processes provide a framework for systematically examining target outcomes and what changes can be made to result in improvement and ensure equity. We present a case study of how QI processes were used as a means of partnership building to enhance equity in designing materials for a Medicaid pilot program, North Carolina Integrated Care for Kids (NC InCK). Description: The NC InCK model addresses social determinants of health by providing structured care integration across core child health and social service areas and using an alternative payment model to incentivize high quality child outcomes. During the two-year planning period prior to the NC InCK model launch, we used Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to conduct usability testing as a QI strategy for a component of the NC InCK model: the Shared Action Plan (SAP). Assessment: We conducted usability testing with four Family Council members, nine care managers, and one physician. Participants reviewed the SAP and provided feedback via a survey. After reviewing feedback with InCK leadership and the Family Council, we implemented recommendations that led to a SAP that uses clear and accessible language, that highlights family strengths and family-identified goals, and that is distinct from other care management plans. Conclusion: Usability testing forced refinement of materials before NC InCK launched, created opportunities for building and enhancing community partnerships and promoted equity within the NC InCK team and Family Council by considering multiple perspectives when deciding on SAP revisions. Significance: What is Already Known on this Subject?: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles are a tool for collecting feedback and improving program components. When conducting usability testing, PDSA cycles can be used to collect feedback from a variety of audiences. What this Study adds?: This case study demonstrates how PDSA cycles can be used to conduct usability testing during the planning period of a large-scale health systems change model. Usability testing created opportunities to refine materials, build and enhance community partnerships, and promote equity among key stakeholders prior to the model launch.