Cogito Ergo Sacre: Sacred Reasoning in Rene Descartes' Method.

The theoretical clash between the sacred and the profane is one of the most compelling aspects of the way humans use discourse in the pursuit of truth. Rene Descartes' method, understood as an attempt to rebuild a body of knowledge by calling all that is known into question, demonstrates this dynami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Communication & Religion Vol. 46; no. 4; pp. 28 - 44
Autor principal: Blood, Adam
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Religious Communication Association Winter2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177057386&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 177057386
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08942838
        GU2
      jtl: Journal of Communication & Religion
      issn: 08942838
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 4
      pid: 12589
      pub: Religious Communication Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177057386
        10.5840/jcr202346419
      ppf: 28
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Cogito Ergo Sacre: Sacred Reasoning in Rene Descartes' Method.
      aug:
        au: Blood, Adam
        affil: Assistant Professor and Director of Speech and Debate in the Department of Communication at the University of West Florida
      su:
        Descartes, René, 1596-1650
        Faith
        Suspicion
        Discourse
        God
        Worldview
      sug:
        subj:
          Descartes, René, 1596-1650
          Faith
          Suspicion
          Discourse
          God
          Worldview
      keyword:
        religious rhetoric1
        Rene Descartes
        the Sacred
      ab: The theoretical clash between the sacred and the profane is one of the most compelling aspects of the way humans use discourse in the pursuit of truth. Rene Descartes' method, understood as an attempt to rebuild a body of knowledge by calling all that is known into question, demonstrates this dynamic. As Descartes disavows all previously held assumptions, he makes a deliberate caveat to exempt his faith in God from suspicion. In this essay, I argue that the separation of Descartes' faith from his method is a meaningful illustration of reasoning from the sacred. I demonstrate that a key role of the sacred is to shape the way a person reasons, even as a sacred belief can hold a vaunted, protected position in that person's worldview. This status of a belief is characterized by two distinct logical structures: separation and security. Finally, based on this analysis, I explicate a few ways that this type of separation has telling implications for our contemporary moral discourse.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Communication & Religion is the property of Religious Communication Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Communication & Religion
      holder: Religious Communication Association
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N