Labour Justice in the Platform Economy.

Recent years have witnessed the rise of digital platforms that allow economic agents to arrange ever more fine‐grained contracts. This article zooms in on labour‐based platforms that permit the hire of labour in a just‐in‐time fashion (and are part of the broader trend towards on‐demand work). Its p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 235 - 251
Main Author: Bieber, Friedemann
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell May2024
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177083314&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 177083314
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02643758
        BQ0
      jtl: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      issn: 02643758
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2024
      vid: 41
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177083314
        10.1111/japp.12639
      ppf: 235
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 238KB
      tig:
        atl: Labour Justice in the Platform Economy.
      aug:
        au: Bieber, Friedemann
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
      su:
        Electronic commerce
        Labor market
        Digital technology
        Brokers
        Fashion
      sug:
        subj:
          Electronic commerce
          Labor market
          Digital technology
          Brokers
          Fashion
      ab: Recent years have witnessed the rise of digital platforms that allow economic agents to arrange ever more fine‐grained contracts. This article zooms in on labour‐based platforms that permit the hire of labour in a just‐in‐time fashion (and are part of the broader trend towards on‐demand work). Its principal contribution comes in three parts. First, exposing the frequently overlooked diversity of labour‐based platforms, the article proposes to distinguish platform companies, which directly sell services and then purchase the labour needed to provide them, and broker platforms, which act merely as intermediaries. Second, it examines how platforms of each type pose distinct threats to labour justice, thereby extending Daniel Halliday's (2021) analysis. Drawing on empirical studies of the experiences of platform workers, it identifies a power imbalance as the root cause of these threats across all platforms. Finally, the article assesses three strategies to counter these threats: introducing stricter regulation, turning platforms into worker‐run co‐ops, and improving outside job opportunities. In exploring how each strategy could be implemented for specific platforms, it makes the case for always discussing labour‐based platforms with one eye to their specific structural features and the other eye to the broader labour market.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Applied Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N