Agent-Regret, Finitude, and the Irrevocability of the Past.
In 'Moral Luck,' Bernard Williams famously argued that "there is a particularly important species of regret, which I shall call 'agent-regret,' which a person can feel only towards his past actions." Much subsequent commentary has focused on Williams's claim that agent-regret is not necessarily rest...
| Published in: | Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 447 - 459 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
May2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177220761&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 177220761 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01677411 NM2 jtl: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy issn: 01677411 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2024 vid: 43 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 177220761 10.1007/s11245-023-09986-3 ppf: 447 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 590KB tig: atl: Agent-Regret, Finitude, and the Irrevocability of the Past. aug: au: Bacharach, Julian affil: https://ror.org/008x57b05 Centre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp, Stadscampus - Gebouw D, D416, Grote Kauwenberg 18, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium su: Williams, Bernard, 1929-2003 Regret Attitude (Psychology) Consciousness sug: subj: Williams, Bernard, 1929-2003 Regret Attitude (Psychology) Consciousness keyword: Agency Bernard Williams Moral Luck Moral psychology Narrative Responsibility ab: In 'Moral Luck,' Bernard Williams famously argued that "there is a particularly important species of regret, which I shall call 'agent-regret,' which a person can feel only towards his past actions." Much subsequent commentary has focused on Williams's claim that agent-regret is not necessarily restricted to voluntary actions, and questioned whether such an attitude could be rationally justified. This focus, however, obscures a more fundamental set of questions raised by Williams's discussion: what is the role in our moral psychology of evaluative attitudes that relate essentially to past exercises of our agency—occurrences which, by their very nature, cannot be repeated? On a standard conception, regret is directed principally towards actions that resulted from suboptimal deliberation. On this view, the main point of regret is to guide us away from similar poor decisions in the future. But Williams's key insight in 'Moral Luck,' I argue, is that there is a mode of evaluation of one's past actions and decisions that does not track considerations one could and should have been responsive to at the time, and is for this reason essentially retrospective. From this perspective, the full significance of regret cannot be captured in terms of a disposition to deliberate better in the future. Rather, the particular kind of painful of consciousness of the past embodied in regret amounts to a reflective, and essentially backward-looking, insight into the contingency and finitude of our own agency—that I am a particular person leading a particular life, and that the possibility of leading a different life is now gone forever. I end by making some speculative comments about the intractable question whether it is ultimately good or desirable to be disposed to regret one's past mistakes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved. item: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|