Rare Opportunity or History Revisited? The Pitfalls and Prospects of Ethical AI in Light of Public Ethical Responses to the Telegraph.
This article undertakes a comparative ethical analysis of the types of public expectations and concerns related to the development of two technologies: the telegraph and artifi cial intelligence. For each technology I provide a historical survey of public ethical expectations and concerns followed b...
| Publicado en: | Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 7 - 45 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wroclaw University Press
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177231145&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 177231145 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18958001 GRKM jtl: Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia issn: 18958001 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2023 vid: 18 iid: 3 pid: 78072 pub: Wroclaw University Press artinfo: ui: 177231145 10.19195/1895-8001.18.3.1 ppf: 7 ppct: 38 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.8MB tig: atl: Rare Opportunity or History Revisited? The Pitfalls and Prospects of Ethical AI in Light of Public Ethical Responses to the Telegraph. aug: au: ANDERSON, MARC M. affil: Loria, Université de Lorraine. su: European Commission Telegraph & telegraphy Artificial intelligence Expectation (Psychology) Popular literature Comparative studies Similarity (Psychology) sug: subj: European Commission Telegraph & telegraphy Artificial intelligence Expectation (Psychology) Popular literature Comparative studies Similarity (Psychology) keyword: artifi cial intelligence comparative ethics ethics public telegraph ab: This article undertakes a comparative ethical analysis of the types of public expectations and concerns related to the development of two technologies: the telegraph and artifi cial intelligence. For each technology I provide a historical survey of public ethical expectations and concerns followed by a survey of the outcome or results of those expectations. Expectations and concerns of the telegraph era public are drawn together from popular and public literature and regulation of the period, whereas the expectations and concerns of our contemporary public AI engagement are drawn both from popular literature and public surveys, and supported by a manual search and ranking of a number of ethics related terms found in the raw feedback of the Stakeholder Consultation on the EU Commission High Level Expert Group Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. I then go on to compare those results, highlighting the similarities and diff erences between the two technologies, in particular the positive economic and socially responsible use expectations outcomes and the negative concerns regarding monopoly, regulation, and control. Finally, I argue that, taking the telegraph outcome as a guide, an ethical focus on accentuating positive expectations toward AI is more likely to produce defi nite results than concentrating upon prohibitory and negative approaches. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia is the property of Wroclaw University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia holder: Wroclaw University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2023 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|