Deep squat test – Functional movement Screen: Convergent validity and ability to discriminate subjects with different levels of joint mobility.

Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is an important tool in the assessment of exercise practice. Assuming FMS lacks precise validity for assessing postural deficits, further research is needed to assess whether it is a sufficiently precise tool for analysing joint mobility. Research aims were to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies Vol. 38; pp. 197 - 205
Autores principales: Aleixo, Pedro, Atalaia, Tiago, Bhudarally, Maria, Miranda, Paulo, Castelinho, Nuno, Abrantes, João
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Churchill Livingstone, Inc. Apr2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177288201&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177288201
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13608592
        8II
      jtl: Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies
      issn: 13608592
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2024
      vid: 38
      pid: 1242
      pub: Churchill Livingstone, Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177288201
        177288201
        177288201
        10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.12.010
        177288201
      ppf: 197
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Deep squat test – Functional movement Screen: Convergent validity and ability to discriminate subjects with different levels of joint mobility.
      aug:
        au:
          Aleixo, Pedro
          Atalaia, Tiago
          Bhudarally, Maria
          Miranda, Paulo
          Castelinho, Nuno
          Abrantes, João
        affil: Centro de Investigação em Desporto, Educação Física, Exercício e Saúde (CIDEFES), Universidade Lusófona, Av. do Campo Grande 376, 1749-024, Lisbon, Portugal
      sug:
        subj:
          Squatting Physiology
          Exercise Test Methods
          Biomechanics
          Functional Assessment
          Movement Evaluation
          Reproducibility of Results
          Joints Physiology
          Human
          Young Adult
          Motion Analysis Systems Utilization
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Descriptive Statistics
          Ankle Joint Physiology
          Knee Joint Physiology
          Hip Joint Physiology
          Shoulder Joint Physiology
          Range of Motion Evaluation
          Criterion-Related Validity
      ab: Functional Movement Screen (FMS) is an important tool in the assessment of exercise practice. Assuming FMS lacks precise validity for assessing postural deficits, further research is needed to assess whether it is a sufficiently precise tool for analysing joint mobility. Research aims were to evaluate: convergent validity of Deep Squat (DS) – one of FMS tests – regarding joint mobility, using data from a three-dimensional motion analysis as a comparable method; DS's ability to discriminate between subjects with different joint mobility levels. Sixty subjects were selected (23.6 ± 3.8 years). DS was performed according to FMS guidelines. Subjects' performance in frontal and sagittal planes was recorded by two video cameras and subsequently scored by two FMS-certified evaluators. Three-dimensional motion analyses of DS were acquired by a Vicon Motion Capture System (200 Hz). Ten trials were acquired for each subject. Ankle, knee, hip, and shoulder angular positions in sagittal plane were determined from the FullBody PlugInGait model. Spearman's coefficient examined the correlation between angular positions and DS score. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the DS ability to discriminate between subjects with different joint mobility levels by comparing different scores. Negligible to moderate correlations were found between DS score and angular positions (−0.5 < r < 0.5). Only shoulder angular positions showed differences between score "1" and "2" (p < 0.05). Shoulder and hip angular positions showed no differences between score "2" and "3" (p < 0.05). DS yielded low convergent validity regarding joint mobility and did not show the ability to discriminate between subjects with different joint mobility levels.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N