Online reflexive resolution and interference.

A reflexive referentially depends on another NP. Long-standing inquiries in sentence processing literature revolve around whether and how forming this coreference relation during online sentence processing is susceptible to similarity-based interference. To address these questions, we conducted four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Language, Cognition & Neuroscience Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 513 - 527
Autores principales: Fujita, Hiroki, Yoshida, Masaya
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177395269&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177395269
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23273798
        IQ6T
      jtl: Language, Cognition & Neuroscience
      issn: 23273798
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2024
      vid: 39
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177395269
        176020625
        177395269
        177395269
        10.1080/23273798.2024.2329269
        177395269
      ppf: 513
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Online reflexive resolution and interference.
      aug:
        au:
          Fujita, Hiroki
          Yoshida, Masaya
        affil: Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Language Processing Evaluation
          World Wide Web
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Grammar
          Human
          Experimental Studies
          Memory
          Language Development
          Funding Source
      ab: A reflexive referentially depends on another NP. Long-standing inquiries in sentence processing literature revolve around whether and how forming this coreference relation during online sentence processing is susceptible to similarity-based interference. To address these questions, we conducted four experiments using L-maze tasks. The results revealed (delayed) interference in ungrammatical sentences, indicating facilitatory interference. We also found that structural information associated with a distractor and related to clause finiteness may influence memory retrieval. Interference effects were not observed in grammatical sentences across all experiments. These results suggest that online reflexive resolution may be susceptible to interference only when the reflexive mismatches its structurally accessible antecedent in features, and that structural information may influence how a distractor interferes with memory retrieval during online sentence processing.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N