Usefulness of working with a person‐centred intervention in a group: Perspectives from facilitators and persons with mental illness.

Background: When implementing new interventions into clinical practice, it is of great importance to investigate the implementation process to better understand factors promoting and impeding the implementation to stimulate engagement and sustainability of the intervention. It is essential to consid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 539 - 548
Autores principales: Jensen, Kira, Maties, Flavia M., Nissen, Hanne B., Christiansen, Jette, Jørgensen, Rikke
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177466573&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177466573
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13561294
        EV1
      jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
      issn: 13561294
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 30
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177466573
        175133270
        177466573
        177466573
        10.1111/jep.13967
        177466573
      ppf: 539
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Usefulness of working with a person‐centred intervention in a group: Perspectives from facilitators and persons with mental illness.
      aug:
        au:
          Jensen, Kira
          Maties, Flavia M.
          Nissen, Hanne B.
          Christiansen, Jette
          Jørgensen, Rikke
        affil: Clinic North, Aalborg University Hospital – Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark
      sug:
        subj:
          Mental Disorders Therapy
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Patient Centered Care Methods
          Psychotherapy Methods
          Outpatient Service
          Health Personnel Psychosocial Factors
          Patient Participation
          Community Mental Health Services
          Group Processes
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Hospitals
          Qualitative Studies
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Content Analysis
          Interpersonal Relations
          Mental Health Evaluation
          Professional Role
          Implementation Science
          Psychiatric Nursing
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: When implementing new interventions into clinical practice, it is of great importance to investigate the implementation process to better understand factors promoting and impeding the implementation to stimulate engagement and sustainability of the intervention. It is essential to consider perspectives both from the health professionals delivering the intervention and those receiving the intervention to be open to their suggestions for enhancing the dissemination and implementation of the intervention. The aim of the study was to evaluate adoption, acceptability and appropriateness of a person‐centred group intervention (PCGI) from the perspectives of facilitators and participants with mental illness in mental health outpatient services right after delivery. Methods: A qualitative interview study design was used. Interview data from three individual interviews, one group interview with facilitators and 16 individual interviews with participants were analyzed through content analysis. Results: As described in the following three categories, the facilitators and participants found the PCGI overall useful and meaningful to deliver and receive: (1) application of a PCGI in clinical practice, (2) balancing the facilitator role and (3) establishing and maintaining a safe relationship. Conclusion: Facilitators and participants found the form and structure of the PCGI useful and meaningful. Some participants dropped out as they did not feel comfortable in a group setting. The components in the sessions, questions on cards and reflection sheets together with peer‐to‐peer interactions provided a safe environment. However, facilitation from facilitators requires appropriate skills and qualifications, which must be provided by the hospital together with supervision and the possibility for peer feedback and exchange of experiences.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N