Sustainability of an outcome measure in outpatient stroke rehabilitation: A realist evaluation.

Rationale: Only half of newly implemented evidence‐based practices are sustained. Though poor sustainment can lead to negative consequences for clinical teams, organizations and patients, the causal explanations of sustainment are largely unknown. Aims and Objectives: We aimed to ascertain how (mech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 559 - 575
Autores principales: Ataman, Rebecca, Ahmed, Sara, Berta, Whitney, Thomas, Aliki
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177466576&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177466576
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13561294
        EV1
      jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
      issn: 13561294
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 30
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177466576
        174946620
        175432519
        177466576
        177466576
        10.1111/jep.13972
        177466576
      ppf: 559
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Sustainability of an outcome measure in outpatient stroke rehabilitation: A realist evaluation.
      aug:
        au:
          Ataman, Rebecca
          Ahmed, Sara
          Berta, Whitney
          Thomas, Aliki
        affil: School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal Québec,, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Environmental Sustainability
          Outcome Assessment
          Stroke Rehabilitation
          Outpatient Service
          Human
          Questionnaires
          Quantitative Studies
          Surveys
          Descriptive Statistics
          Qualitative Studies
          Interviews
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Implementation Science
          Program Evaluation
          Decision Making
      ab: Rationale: Only half of newly implemented evidence‐based practices are sustained. Though poor sustainment can lead to negative consequences for clinical teams, organizations and patients, the causal explanations of sustainment are largely unknown. Aims and Objectives: We aimed to ascertain how (mechanisms) and in what circumstances (context) a newly implemented outcome measure in rehabilitation was sustained or not (outcome). Methodology: Informed by an integrated knowledge translation approach, we conducted a realist evaluation using a mixed method, embedded single case study design with data collection up to 18 months following the implementation of the Mayo‐Portland Adaptability Inventory ‐ version 4 (MPAI‐4), a rehabilitation outcome measure. Quantitative data (survey and patient charts) was analysed using descriptive statistics, then integrated with qualitative data (interviews with 10 key informants) and analysed using inductive and deductive retroduction. We integrated the data to develop a case description and ultimately, to refine the programme theory to better understand the sustainability of the MPAI‐4. Results: We linked context, mechanisms and outcomes, and also emphasized sustainability strategies in 18 explanations of how sustainability works. These explanations provide evidence for four overarching patterns: (1) implementation and sustainability phases are interconnected, (2) outcomes build on each other recursively, with patient benefits as the keystone outcome, (3) sustainment is achieved to varying levels across different sustainability outcomes [e.g., high level (e.g., rate of MPAI‐4 scoring: 77.7%) to low level (e.g., rate of MPAI‐4 application to clinical decision‐making: 3.7%)] and (4) the work of sustaining the MPAI‐4 is shared amongst different stakeholders. Conclusion: Implementation teams can draw from this programme theory to improve the sustainment of outcomes measures while researchers could continue to refine the theory. Continued investigation of sustainability, including diverse and continuous sustainability outcomes, is needed to understand how to maintain improvements in quality of care and patient outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N