The Myth of the Need for Diversity Among Subjects in Theory-Testing Research: Comments on "Racial Inequality in Psychological Research" by Roberts et al. (2020).

Roberts and colleagues focus on two aspects of racial inequality in psychological research, namely an alleged underrepresentation of racial minorities and the effects attributed to this state of affairs. My comment focuses only on one aspect, namely the assumed consequences of the lack of diversity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Perspectives on Psychological Science Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 577 - 580
Autor principal: Stroebe, Wolfgang
Formato: commentary Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. May2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177473316&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177473316
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17456916
        1WQQ
      jtl: Perspectives on Psychological Science
      issn: 17456916
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2024
      vid: 19
      iid: 3
      pid: 20732
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177473316
        177473316
        177473316
        10.1177/17456916241236165
        177473316
      ppf: 577
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Myth of the Need for Diversity Among Subjects in Theory-Testing Research: Comments on "Racial Inequality in Psychological Research" by Roberts et al. (2020).
      aug:
        au: Stroebe, Wolfgang
        affil: University of Groningen
      sug:
        subj:
          Race Factors
          Research Subjects
          Theory Validation
          Stress, Psychological
          Minority Groups
          Causality
          Humanism
          Hypothesis
          Philosophy
          External Validity
      ab: Roberts and colleagues focus on two aspects of racial inequality in psychological research, namely an alleged underrepresentation of racial minorities and the effects attributed to this state of affairs. My comment focuses only on one aspect, namely the assumed consequences of the lack of diversity in subject populations. Representativeness of samples is essential in survey research or applied research that examines whether a particular intervention will work for a particular population. Representativeness or diversity is not necessary in theory-testing research, where we attempt to establish laws of causality. Because theories typically apply to all of humanity, all members of humanity (even American undergraduates) are suitable for assessing the validity of theoretical hypotheses. Admittedly, the assumption that a theory applies to all of humanity is also a hypothesis that can be tested. However, to test it, we need theoretical hypotheses about specific moderating variables. Supporting a theory with a racially diverse sample does not make conclusions more valid than support from a nondiverse sample. In fact, cause-effect conclusions based on a diverse sample might not be valid for any member of that sample.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        commentary
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N