'Not a panacea' – Expert perspectives on the concept of resilience and its potential for palliative care.

Background: Resilience is an increasingly used term in medicine and subject to various definitions, often not easy to grasp. There are established core concepts for patients receiving palliative care, for example, meaning in life, that have already been researched a lot. Resilience, relative to thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Palliative Care & Social Practice pp. 1 - 16
Autores principales: Maus, Katja, Peusquens, Frank, Kriegsmann-Rabe, Milena, Matthias, Julia-Katharina, Ateş, Gülay, Jaspers, Birgit, Geiser, Franziska, Radbruch, Lukas
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 5/27/2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177534051&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177534051
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        26323524
        M8AB
      jtl: Palliative Care & Social Practice
      issn: 26323524
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 5/27/2024
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177534051
        177534051
        177534051
        10.1177/26323524241254839
        177534051
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: 'Not a panacea' – Expert perspectives on the concept of resilience and its potential for palliative care.
      aug:
        au:
          Maus, Katja
          Peusquens, Frank
          Kriegsmann-Rabe, Milena
          Matthias, Julia-Katharina
          Ateş, Gülay
          Jaspers, Birgit
          Geiser, Franziska
          Radbruch, Lukas
        affil: Conceptualization, Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn 53127, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Physician Attitudes Evaluation
          Palliative Care
          Hardiness
          Expert Clinicians
          Patient Care
          Significant Other
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Qualitative Studies
          Content Analysis
          Critical Illness
          Interviews
          Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological
          Mindfulness
          Social Environment
          Spirituality
          Quality of Life
          Self Concept
          Coping
          Holistic Care
          Data Analysis Software
          Self-Efficacy
          Emotional Regulation
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Resilience is an increasingly used term in medicine and subject to various definitions, often not easy to grasp. There are established core concepts for patients receiving palliative care, for example, meaning in life, that have already been researched a lot. Resilience, relative to these concepts, is a new object of research in palliative care, where it has so far been used predominantly with regard to the well-being of teams. Aim: To explore how experts in palliative care define the concept of resilience and its suitability for patients, significant others, and professionals. Design: Qualitative study using summarizing content analysis according to Mayring. Setting/participants: Twenty-one health and social care professionals with expertise caring for persons with life-threatening/limiting illnesses and their relatives were interviewed in three individual interviews and four focus groups. All conversations were recorded, transcribed, coded via MAXQDA, and validated by another researcher. Results: Resilience has been described as something procedural, dynamic, individual, and flexible. In connection with well-known concepts such as posttraumatic growth or terms from the field of mindfulness, social environment or personal factors have also been linked to resilience. Resources such as spirituality can contribute to resilience, and resilience itself can function as a resource, for example, by contributing to quality of life. An active use of the term in practical work with patients or relatives is rare, but it is used in education or team measures. Limited lifespan can pose a challenge to an active use of the concept of resilience. Conclusion: Resilience as a very individual approach provides added value to other core concepts of palliative care. Within the palliative context, the normative dimension of resilience must be well reflected. A broader definition of resilience is recommended, leaving room for everyone to find their own form of resilience. The concept of resilience in palliative care includes opportunities as well as risks and should, therefore, be implemented carefully, requiring specific training. Plain language summary: What experts think about resilience in palliative care Why was this study done? Resilience is described as a process of coping with stress or adversity while remaining physically and mentally functional. Resilience is subject to a range of definitions. In the context of palliative care, where many other concepts, such as meaning in life, are already used, the definition of resilience also represents a challenge. We wanted to learn how people working in palliative care, defined by us as experts, understand and use the concept of resilience. In addition, there are three different target groups for resilience: patients, significant others and professionals. We wanted to learn about the differences in the application of resilience to these groups. What did the researchers do? We conducted interviews with a total of 21 experts in individual and group settings (so-called focus groups). All interviews and focus groups were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim to analyse them precisely using qualitative methods. What did the researchers find? This study shows how resilience is understood in the work field of the participants: namely as something procedural, dynamic, individual and flexible but normative at the same time. Factors such as the social environment, the number and intensity of crises already experienced (known as the idea of posttraumatic growth), aspects from the field of mindfulness or spirituality can contribute to developing resilience, which is why we call these things resources for resilience. Experts use the term resilience less in their daily work with patients or significant others, but more in education. What do the findings mean? The concept of resilience in palliative care involves both risks and opportunities. Practical work with the concept has to be well reflected and must be applied sensitively. Therefore, it is essential that professional as well as informal caregivers receive specific training that also includes respect for each individual's personal concept of resilience.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N