A Decolonial Syncretism of Unity.

The term syncretism has had a metamorphic history in terms of its meaning, starting as positive with Plutarch, to being positive and negative during the Reformation, and then becoming neutral and negative after the Reformation to becoming decidedly negative from the 1920s onward. Despite advances in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Review of Mission Vol. 113; no. 1; pp. 202 - 223
Autor principal: Green, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell May2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177613757&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 177613757
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00208582
        IRM
      jtl: International Review of Mission
      issn: 00208582
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2024
      vid: 113
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177613757
        10.1111/irom.12493
      ppf: 202
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 254KB
      tig:
        atl: A Decolonial Syncretism of Unity.
      aug:
        au: Green, Michael
      su:
        Plutarch, ca. 46-120
        Decolonization
        Concord
        Councils & synods
        Scholarly method
        Semantics
      sug:
        subj:
          Plutarch, ca. 46-120
          Decolonization
          Concord
          Councils & synods
          Scholarly method
          Semantics
      keyword:
        being
        cosmology
        decolonialism
        epistemology
        liminality
        non‐being
        ontology
        syncretism
      ab: The term syncretism has had a metamorphic history in terms of its meaning, starting as positive with Plutarch, to being positive and negative during the Reformation, and then becoming neutral and negative after the Reformation to becoming decidedly negative from the 1920s onward. Despite advances in interpreting syncretism in more neutral or positive ways, the word's meaning and function remain imprecise. Central to the fog surrounding the word is its implicit meaning of some type of mixture, whether negative, neutral, or positive. The question then becomes, "Is mixture a valid central meaning of the word?" More importantly, can the suspicious lens of decolonialism offer insight into redefining it and also give direction as to how it could function? This article studies the development of the term, examines current scholarship within the World Council of Churches, and situates syncretism within the larger context of the decolonial discussion in trying to redefine it in light of its original meaning.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of International Review of Mission is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: International Review of Mission
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N