Patient‐led innovation and global health justice: Open‐source digital health technology for type 1 diabetes care.

Health innovation is mainly envisioned in direct connection to medical research institutions or pharmaceutical and technology companies. Yet, these types of innovation often do not meet the needs and expectations of individuals affected by health conditions. With the emergence of digital health tech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Bioethics Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 511 - 529
Autores principales: Jansky, Bianca, Hendl, Tereza, Nocanda, Azakhiwe Z.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=177717328&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 177717328
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02699702
        6PJ
      jtl: Bioethics
      issn: 02699702
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2024
      vid: 38
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177717328
        10.1111/bioe.13205
      ppf: 511
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Patient‐led innovation and global health justice: Open‐source digital health technology for type 1 diabetes care.
      aug:
        au:
          Jansky, Bianca
          Hendl, Tereza
          Nocanda, Azakhiwe Z.
        affil:
          Institute for Ethics and History of Health in Society, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
          Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University, Munich, Germany
          Faculty of Social Sciences, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
      su:
        Health services accessibility
        Social justice
        Diffusion of innovations
        Patient care
        Communities
        Bioethics
        Race
        Social integration
        Health equity
        Psychosocial factors
        Patients' attitudes
        Digital technology
        Type 1 diabetes
        People with diabetes
        Digital health
        Insulin pumps
        World health
        Medical needs assessment
        Automation
      sug:
        subj:
          Health services accessibility
          Social justice
          Diffusion of innovations
          Patient care
          Communities
          Bioethics
          Race
          Social integration
          Health equity
          Psychosocial factors
          Patients' attitudes
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Digital technology
          Type 1 diabetes
          People with diabetes
          Digital health
          Insulin pumps
          World health
          Medical needs assessment
          Automation
      keyword:
        digital health
        empirical bioethics
        health justice
        mHealth
        open‐source
        patient‐led innovation
        digital health
        empirical bioethics
        health justice
        mHealth
        open‐source
        patient‐led innovation
      ab: Health innovation is mainly envisioned in direct connection to medical research institutions or pharmaceutical and technology companies. Yet, these types of innovation often do not meet the needs and expectations of individuals affected by health conditions. With the emergence of digital health technologies and social media, we can observe a shift, which involves people living with illness modifying and improving medical and health devices outside of the formal research and development sector, figuring both as users and innovators. This patient‐led innovation has been celebrated in innovation studies and economics as a "bottom‐up" type of innovation. In this article, we take a closer look at open‐source patient‐led innovation in the context of type 1 diabetes care. In our inquiry, we pay particular attention to the social and ethical dimensions of this innovation, building on empirical material. Upon exploring the notion of patient‐led innovation and its socio‐political context through the lens of intersectional and global health justice, we argue that a proactive strategy is needed to ensure that open‐source patient‐led innovation will be more globally accessible, center the health needs of the most underserved populations, as well as facilitate equitable and just health benefits. To support this aim, we provide a range of examples of different initiatives addressing the persistent inequalities that have so far inhibited patient‐led innovation from more fully materializing its innovative potential.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N