Horizontality.

This paper examines a common directive in the theory of the Modern Movement concerning the vertical surfaces of buildings: the dominance of the horizontal direction over the vertical direction of traditional architecture. While assumed by the protagonists and apologists of the Modern Movement to be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Architectural Education Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 17 - 27
Autor principal: SCHUMACHER, THOMAS L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Sep2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=17780561&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 17780561
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10464883
        18P
      jtl: Journal of Architectural Education
      issn: 10464883
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2005
      vid: 59
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        17780561
        10.1111/j.1531-314X.2005.00002.x
      ppf: 17
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.7MB
      tig:
        atl: Horizontality.
      aug:
        au: SCHUMACHER, THOMAS L.
        affil: University of Maryland
      su:
        Modern movement (Architecture)
        Construction
        Architecture
        Signs & symbols
        Modernism (Christian theology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Modern movement (Architecture)
          Construction
          Architecture
          Signs & symbols
          Modernism (Christian theology)
      ab: This paper examines a common directive in the theory of the Modern Movement concerning the vertical surfaces of buildings: the dominance of the horizontal direction over the vertical direction of traditional architecture. While assumed by the protagonists and apologists of the Modern Movement to be a concomitant of technology, this tacit directive is examined here as an aesthetic emblem rather than a rational or functional ideal and is contextualized as a badge of Modernism's identity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Architectural Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Architectural Education
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2005
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N