PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE QUARANTINE MODEL: PHILOSOPHICAL CONCERNS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS.
The quarantine model, recently proposed by Pereboom and Caruso, is one of the most influential models developed to date in the context of criminal justice. The quarantine model challenges the very idea of criminal punishment and asserts that nobody deserves punishment on a fundamental level. Instead...
| Publicado en: | Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy Vol. 21; no. 79; pp. 146 - 163 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy
Mar2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177889204&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 177889204 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 17335566 77X1 jtl: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy issn: 17335566 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2024 vid: 21 iid: 79 pid: 49926 pub: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy artinfo: ui: 177889204 10.33392/diam.1892 ppf: 146 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE QUARANTINE MODEL: PHILOSOPHICAL CONCERNS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS. aug: au: Farina, Mirko Lavazza, Andrea Levin, Sergei affil: Xiamen University [XMU], China. University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran. Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy Via Garbasso, 42, 52100 Arezzo, Italy. University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Business School 182 Pearse St, Dublin 2, D02 F6N2, Ireland. su: Criminal justice policy Public safety Quarantine Individual needs Crime sug: subj: Criminal justice policy Public safety Quarantine Individual needs Crime keyword: Caruso dangerousness Pereboom punishment retributivism ab: The quarantine model, recently proposed by Pereboom and Caruso, is one of the most influential models developed to date in the context of criminal justice. The quarantine model challenges the very idea of criminal punishment and asserts that nobody deserves punishment on a fundamental level. Instead, in order to deal with offenders, it proposes a series of incapacitation measures based on public safety concerns. In this article, we examine several objections to the quarantine model that demonstrate how, in our view, it can be improved. These mainly pertain to (2.1) the difficulty of reliably identifying dangerous individuals and consequently the need to base confinement decisions on probability, and (2.2) the potential for the quarantine model not to properly deter certain crimes. Three additional objections are raised with respect to (3.1) the rights that are potentially suppressed in the quarantine model; (3.2) the role of “genetic justice”; and (3.3) the difficulty it faces accommodating reasons-responsiveness. Whereas these objections do not constitute knock-down arguments against the quarantine model, they highlight issues that invite closer scrutiny, at least if it is to be considered as a credible framework for the development of viable policies in criminal justice. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy is the property of Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy holder: Diametros: An Online Journal of Philosophy dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|