Rebuking Vi??u and Reaping the Rewards: Divine Slander and Ambivalent Justifications in Sanskrit Narrative.

This paper argues that a concept of rebuking God (bhagavannindā) existed as a prohibited act in premodern Sanskrit Brahmanical texts, with the earliest examples in medieval Vaiava narratives (in the Bhāgavata Purāa and Viu Purāa) of Vena and Śiśupāla. The concept of bhagavannindā problematizes the B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Oriental Society Vol. 144; no. 2; pp. 259 - 285
Autor principal: SHARMA, VISHAL
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) Apr-Jun2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177935284&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 177935284
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00030279
        JOY
      jtl: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      issn: 00030279
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr-Jun2024
      vid: 144
      iid: 2
      pid: 1463
      pub: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177935284
        10.7817/jaos.144.2.2024.ar009
      ppf: 259
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 6MB
      tig:
        atl: Rebuking Vi??u and Reaping the Rewards: Divine Slander and Ambivalent Justifications in Sanskrit Narrative.
      aug:
        au: SHARMA, VISHAL
        affil: UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
      su:
        God
        Theology
        Liberty
        Hostility
        Hate
      sug:
        subj:
          God
          Theology
          Liberty
          Hostility
          Hate
      ab: This paper argues that a concept of rebuking God (bhagavannindā) existed as a prohibited act in premodern Sanskrit Brahmanical texts, with the earliest examples in medieval Vaiava narratives (in the Bhāgavata Purāa and Viu Purāa) of Vena and Śiśupāla. The concept of bhagavannindā problematizes the Bhāgavata Purāa rereading of the Śiśupāla story: how can someone rebuke a god (here Ka) and be seemingly rewarded (through sāyujya [union] with the god)? I argue that to this problem in Vaiava and epic narratives the Bhāgavata Purāa offers dveabhakti / vairānubandha (liberation through enmity or hatred) as a potential solution . Finally, through investigation of two early modern commentaries on the Mahābhārata, I argue that reading this concept of divine censure into the epics was not without tensions . The epic commentators sometimes reveal their own ambivalent readings of episodes where Ka is rebuked. The paper draws attention to the importance of the Bhāgavata Purāa as a commentary on the Mahābhārata, upon which later exegetes relied . It surveys how and why the peculiar concept of dveabhakti emerges in Vaianava theology and presents narrative as both the source where this orthodox concept of divine censure emerges and the site where the concept is reinforced in commentary .
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of the American Oriental Society is the property of American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of the American Oriental Society
      holder: American Society for Premodern Asia (ASPA)
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N