The development and preliminary evaluation of the Genetic Counseling Skills Checklist.

Genetic counseling (GC) relies on communication to help people understand and adapt to genetic contributions of disease, and there is need for a practical and reliable method of comprehensively documenting GC communication skills without intensive coding. To this end, we created a novel process meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Genetic Counseling Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 578 - 592
Autores principales: Hehmeyer, Katherine N., Zierhut, Heather, Dedrick, Robert, Dean, Marleah, Schwarting, Kathryn, Bellia, Katie Sullivan, Cragun, Deborah
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177945708&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177945708
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10597700
        41A
      jtl: Journal of Genetic Counseling
      issn: 10597700
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 33
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177945708
        177945708
        177945708
        10.1002/jgc4.1758
        177945708
      ppf: 578
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: The development and preliminary evaluation of the Genetic Counseling Skills Checklist.
      aug:
        au:
          Hehmeyer, Katherine N.
          Zierhut, Heather
          Dedrick, Robert
          Dean, Marleah
          Schwarting, Kathryn
          Bellia, Katie Sullivan
          Cragun, Deborah
        affil: Department of Genetics, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando Florida,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Genetic Counselors
          Genetic Counseling
          Communication Skills Evaluation
          Instrument Construction
          Instrument Validation
          Checklists Evaluation
          Human
          Validation Studies
          Content Validity
          Interrater Reliability
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          kappa Statistic
          Item Analysis
      ab: Genetic counseling (GC) relies on communication to help people understand and adapt to genetic contributions of disease, and there is need for a practical and reliable method of comprehensively documenting GC communication skills without intensive coding. To this end, we created a novel process measure called the Genetic Counseling Skills Checklist (GCSC), utilizing previously validated measures, communication/counseling frameworks, and prior research findings. A multistage iterative process was used to develop, evaluate, and modify the GCSC to improve its clarity, usability, and content validity. To assess interrater reliability, randomly assigned, untrained individuals (i.e., coders) used the GCSC version 3 to code multiple simulated GC sessions. Average measures intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for each of the 8 GCSC process categories using one‐way, random effects models. After relatively minor modifications to the GCSC, two pairs of experienced coders used GCSC version 4 to independently code additional GC sessions and Cohen's Kappa coefficients (κ) were calculated to assess interrater reliability for each process category. The GCSC contains five to eight items within each category and demonstrates good content validity given its ability to capture nearly all GC skills that genetic counselors reported using in a prior qualitative study. Interrater reliability of GCSC version 3 among coders with limited experience was moderate or good for 6 out of the 8 process categories as evidenced by ICCs ranging from 0.55 to 0.86. Average interrater reliability of GCSC version 4 among one pair of experienced coders was strong for all eight process categories (κ ranging from 0.82 to 0.94); among the second pair of experienced coders scores were strong for six categories (κ ranging from 0.80 to 0.87) and moderate for two categories (κ of 0.77 and 0.78). The results suggest the need for training and experience to assure adequate interrater reliability across GCSC coders. Future work is needed to create a formalized training program for coders, complete a larger study to further validate the measure, and use the GCSC to document variability in skills used across providers and sessions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N