The sting of negativity: Irad Kimhi and Michael Della Rocca on the Parmenidean challenge.
Irad Kimhi considers the conundrum, first addressed by Parmenides, of how negative facts can be the case and be thought, to be the puzzle that philosophy has been working to solve since Plato and Aristotle and wants to do his part by criticizing Frege's dissociation of sense and force and developing...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 577 - 596 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177946809&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 177946809 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09668373 7PU jtl: European Journal of Philosophy issn: 09668373 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2024 vid: 32 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 177946809 10.1111/ejop.12888 ppf: 577 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: The sting of negativity: Irad Kimhi and Michael Della Rocca on the Parmenidean challenge. aug: au: Koch, Anton Friedrich affil: Philosophisches Seminar, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany su: Kimhi, Irad Rocca, Michael Della Philosophy Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. Consciousness sug: subj: Kimhi, Irad Rocca, Michael Della Philosophy Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. Consciousness ab: Irad Kimhi considers the conundrum, first addressed by Parmenides, of how negative facts can be the case and be thought, to be the puzzle that philosophy has been working to solve since Plato and Aristotle and wants to do his part by criticizing Frege's dissociation of sense and force and developing a more Aristotelian account of judgment. Michael Della Rocca considers the conundrum a hopeless aporia that we must avoid by embracing Parmenides' radical monism of being and in a recent article ("Parmenides' insight and the possibility of logic") aims to show that Kimhi is confronted with exactly the kind of insoluble difficulties that he that finds in Frege. The present article agrees with Kimhi that we can think about what is not the case, although thinking reaches all the way to what IS the case. But Della Rocca is right that Kimhi cannot explain by virtue of what we are able to do this. The counter‐proposal says: (1) Thinking reaches to being in that we have learned to read things in the intersubjective spatial field of consciousness as model tokens of singular propositions about them. (2) Negation can be thought of because thinking has its very origin in absolute, non‐well‐founded negation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: European Journal of Philosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|