Catching Fire: How National Humiliation Spreads Hostile Foreign Policy Preferences on Chinese Social Media.

Research shows that emotions alter preferences, which are central to many models of political choice. However, how can theories that explain individual-level preference change explain policy outcomes, which usually take place at higher levels of analysis? I outline three competing approaches to this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Studies Quarterly Vol. 68; no. 2; pp. 1 - 14
Main Author: Masterson, Michael
Format: Article
Published: Oxford University Press / USA Jun2024
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=177948001&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 177948001
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00208833
        ISQ
      jtl: International Studies Quarterly
      issn: 00208833
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 68
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177948001
        10.1093/isq/sqae033
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 177948001
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 177948001
      tig:
        atl: Catching Fire: How National Humiliation Spreads Hostile Foreign Policy Preferences on Chinese Social Media.
      aug:
        au: Masterson, Michael
        affil: Missouri State University , United States
      su:
        Social media
        International relations
        Group identity
        Humiliation
        Aggression (International law)
        Emotional contagion
      sug:
        subj:
          Social media
          International relations
          Group identity
          Foreign affairs
          International Affairs
          Humiliation
          Aggression (International law)
          Emotional contagion
      keyword:
        conflict
        emotions
        preferences
        conflict
        emotions
        preferences
      ab: Research shows that emotions alter preferences, which are central to many models of political choice. However, how can theories that explain individual-level preference change explain policy outcomes, which usually take place at higher levels of analysis? I outline three competing approaches to this question, ultimately building on the third approach, which argues that emotions can spread through emotional contagion within identity groups. This implies emotions can broadly shift preferences towards or away from conflict during crises. It also explains how identities, which are relatively constant over the medium term, can suddenly become fault lines in a conflict. I find supporting evidence using a large (more than 1.6 billion posts) nationally representative data set of Chinese social media posts. Users' national humiliation posts lead their followers to become more likely to make posts about national humiliation, suggesting contagion, and about using military force and maintaining territorial disputes, suggesting preference change.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N