Akrasijos samprata D. Husako baudžiamosios atsakomybės teorijoje ir alternatyvios sampratos pranašumai.

This article explores two concepts of akrasia and their relation to the ascription of responsibility in Douglas Husak's theory of criminal responsibility. Ever since Plato's Protagoras, the problem of akrasia has been tightly related to the issue of moral knowledge. By using influential texts of anc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 105; pp. 116 - 130
Autor principal: Šataitis, Gediminas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177976282&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 177976282
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2024
      vid: 105
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177976282
        10.15388/10.15388/problemos.2024.105.9
      ppf: 116
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 9.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Akrasijos samprata D. Husako baudžiamosios atsakomybės teorijoje ir alternatyvios sampratos pranašumai.
      aug:
        au: Šataitis, Gediminas
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos institutas
      su:
        Criminal liability
        Ancient philosophy
        Christian ethics
        Behavioral research
        Responsibility
      sug:
        subj:
          Criminal liability
          Ancient philosophy
          Christian ethics
          Behavioral research
          Responsibility
      keyword:
        akrasia
        criminal responsibility
        Husak
        intrapersonal conflict
        moral ignorance
        akrasija
        baudžiamoji atsakomybė
        Husakas
        moralinis nežinojimas
        vidinis konfliktas
      ab:
        This article explores two concepts of akrasia and their relation to the ascription of responsibility in Douglas Husak's theory of criminal responsibility. Ever since Plato's Protagoras, the problem of akrasia has been tightly related to the issue of moral knowledge. By using influential texts of ancient and Christian ethics, as well as contemporary research on akratic behavior, this article outlines a different conception of akrasia, one that is based on intrapersonal conflict. In his theory, Husak employs the concept of akrasia related to moral knowledge-ignorance, albeit sourcing its presuppositions from contemporary skeptics rather than from ancient philosophy. Yet, Husak's theory is not skeptical. The article highlights the main drawbacks of this theory. These drawbacks are grounded in Husak's conception of the akratic agent and the ascription of responsibility to such an agent. Their analysis reveals the advantages of the concept of akrasia based on intrapersonal conflict for constructing a non-skeptical theory of criminal responsibility.
        Straipsnyje tyrinėjamos dvi akrasijos sampratos ir jų santykis su atsakomybės priskyrimu Douglaso Husako baudžiamosios atsakomybės teorijoje. Nuo Platono Protagoro laikų akrasijos problema filosofijoje glaudžiai siejama su moralinio žinojimo klausimu. Pasitelkiant Antikos bei krikščioniškajai etikai itin reikšmingus tekstus, taip pat šiuolaikinius akratiško elgesio tyrinėjimus, straipsnyje išryškinama kita -- vidiniu konfliktu paremta akrasijos samprata. Husako teorijoje taikoma akrasijos samprata akcentuoja moralinį žinojimą- nežinojimą. Tačiau jos prielaidų šaltinis yra ne Antika, o šiuolaikiniai moralinės atsakomybės priskyrimo skeptikai, nors paties Husako teorija nėra skeptinė. Darbe išryškinami esminiai Husako teorijos trūkumai. Šie trūkumai atsiremia į Husako akratiško veikėjo sampratą ir kaip tokiam veikėjui priskiriama atsakomybė. Jų nagrinėjimas leidžia parodyti vidiniu konfliktu grįstos akrasijos sampratos pranašumus konstruojant neskeptinę baudžiamosios atsakomybės teoriją.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N