On the Absolute and Relative Pessimistic Inductions: A Reply to S. Park.

This article explores the pessimistic induction argument against scientific realism, which suggests that because past scientific theories have been proven wrong, we should be skeptical of our current theories. The author examines two versions of this argument, the Absolute Pessimistic Induction (API...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 105; pp. 208 - 214
Autor principal: Hess, Elijah
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=177976288&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 177976288
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2024
      vid: 105
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177976288
        10.15388/Problemos.2024.105.16
      ppf: 208
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 4.1MB
      tig:
        atl: On the Absolute and Relative Pessimistic Inductions: A Reply to S. Park.
      aug:
        au: Hess, Elijah
        affil: St. Louis Community College, Wildwood, Missouri, USA
      su:
        Realism
        Philosophy of science
        Scientific knowledge
        Germ theory of disease
        History of science
        Scientific method
      sug:
        subj:
          Realism
          Philosophy of science
          Scientific knowledge
          Germ theory of disease
          History of science
          Scientific method
      ab: This article explores the pessimistic induction argument against scientific realism, which suggests that because past scientific theories have been proven wrong, we should be skeptical of our current theories. The author examines two versions of this argument, the Absolute Pessimistic Induction (API) and the Relative Pessimistic Induction (RPI), and argues that both are flawed due to the ambiguity of the phrase "earlier theories" in the premises. The text also discusses the arguments of pessimists who aim to disconnect the success of a scientific theory from its truth, known as the Absolute Pessimistic Deduction (APD) and the Relative Pessimistic Deduction (RPD). The author suggests that recent examples of successful theories being false challenge the idea that only realism can explain scientific success.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N