Operability of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) Tasks Using Voluntary Closing and Voluntary Opening Body-Powered Prosthesis Simulator.
Introduction: Body-powered prostheses are still essential in practice. There are two types of mechanisms to manipulate bodypowered prostheses: voluntary closing (VC) and voluntary opening (VO). However, there are no studies investigating which is better suited for what type of movement in daily life...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Prosthetics & Orthotics (JPO) Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 185 - 193 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Jul2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178054421&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 178054421 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10408800 GFL jtl: Journal of Prosthetics & Orthotics (JPO) issn: 10408800 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 36 iid: 3 pid: 433 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 178054421 178054421 178054421 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000509 178054421 ppf: 185 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Operability of the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) Tasks Using Voluntary Closing and Voluntary Opening Body-Powered Prosthesis Simulator. aug: au: Chika Nishizaka Hiroshi Mano Teruki Shibata Satoko Noguchi Mio Kobayashi Nobuhiko Haga Kengo Ohnishi Sayaka Fujiwara affil: Affiliated with the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. sug: subj: Limb Prosthesis Clinical Assessment Tools Task Performance and Analysis Equipment and Supplies Prosthesis Design Grip Strength Physiology Human Male Female Adult Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test Descriptive Statistics Age Factors Life Style Amputation Activities of Daily Living Assistive Technology Devices Quality of Life Sex Factors Sample Size Effect Size Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: Introduction: Body-powered prostheses are still essential in practice. There are two types of mechanisms to manipulate bodypowered prostheses: voluntary closing (VC) and voluntary opening (VO). However, there are no studies investigating which is better suited for what type of movement in daily life. Materials and Methods: The participants were eight right-handed, able-bodied adults. They were divided into two groups: a VC-to-VO group, in which the VC type was practiced first and then the VO type, and a VO-to-VC group, in which they practiced in the opposite order. VC/VO-type terminal device (EquiluxTM) was attached to a body-powered prosthesis simulator for the left hand, and the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP) tasks were practiced repeatedly. We compared the VC type and VO type for the number of practices to reach a plateau, Index of Functionality (IOF) score, the six prehensile pattern scores, and the time required for the 26 SHAP tasks. Scores were also compared before and after practice. In addition, changes in IOF and scores for each of the six patterns with proficiency were compared between VC type and VO type. Results: Significant improvements were observed with manipulation practice for both types of devices. The mean SHAP scores at the plateau were 82.6 for VO type and 92.0 for VC type, with VC type significantly higher than VO type. In the six prehensile pattern scores, only two patterns, Tripod and Power, showed significant differences. When comparing the time required, Food Cutting task was an exception and significantly faster in the VC type, while there were no significant differences for the other tasks. Conclusions: It was suggested that the VC type is more suitable for tasks requiring grip strength pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|