Asymmetrical genetic attributions for the presence and absence of health problems.

Recent research has suggested that people more readily make genetic attributions for positively valenced or desirable traits than for negatively valenced or undesirable traits—an asymmetry that may be mediated by perceptions that positive characteristics are more 'natural' than negative ones. This r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychology & Health Vol. 39; no. 7; pp. 839 - 858
Autores principales: Lebowitz, Matthew S., Tabb, Kathryn, Appelbaum, Paul S.
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178068345&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178068345
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08870446
        7WK
      jtl: Psychology & Health
      issn: 08870446
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2024
      vid: 39
      iid: 7
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178068345
        158940175
        178068345
        178068345
        10.1080/08870446.2022.2119236
        178068345
      ppf: 839
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Asymmetrical genetic attributions for the presence and absence of health problems.
      aug:
        au:
          Lebowitz, Matthew S.
          Tabb, Kathryn
          Appelbaum, Paul S.
        affil: Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Causal Attribution Evaluation
          Genetics Evaluation
          Health Beliefs
          Attitude to Health
          Outcomes (Health Care)
          Human
          Funding Source
          Male
          Female
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Vignettes
          Health Status
          Male
          Female
      ab: Recent research has suggested that people more readily make genetic attributions for positively valenced or desirable traits than for negatively valenced or undesirable traits—an asymmetry that may be mediated by perceptions that positive characteristics are more 'natural' than negative ones. This research sought to examine whether a similar asymmetry in genetic attributions would emerge between positive and negative health outcomes. Across seven experiments, participants were randomly assigned to read a short vignette describing an individual experiencing a health problem (e.g. hypertension) or a corresponding healthy state (e.g. normal blood pressure). All participants provided ratings of naturalness and genetic attributions for the outcome described in their assigned vignette. For diagnoses other than addictive disorders, participants rated the presence of a diagnosis as less genetically caused than its absence; for addictive disorders, the presence of a diagnosis was rated as more genetically caused than its absence. Participants consistently rated the presence of a health problem as less natural than its absence. Even within a single domain of health, people ascribe differing degrees of 'naturalness' and genetic causation to positive versus negative health outcomes, which could impact their preferences for treatment and prevention strategies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N