Reliability and Validity of Maximal Respiratory Pressures.
Background: Maximal respiratory pressure is used to assess the inspiratory and expiratory muscles strength by using maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax ) and maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax). This study aimed to summarize and evaluate the reliability and validity of maximal respiratory pressure m...
| Publicado en: | Respiratory Care Vol. 69; no. 7; pp. 881 - 891 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Jul2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178099092&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 178099092 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00201324 4GG jtl: Respiratory Care issn: 00201324 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 69 iid: 7 pid: 1365 pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. place: New Rochelle, New York artinfo: ui: 178099092 178099092 178099092 10.4187/respcare.10641 178099092 ppf: 881 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Reliability and Validity of Maximal Respiratory Pressures. aug: au: Silveira, Bruna M. F. Pereira, Hugo L. A. Chaves, Gabriela Ho, Daniel G. C. Parreira, Verônica F. affil: Rehabilitation Sciences Program at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazi sug: subj: Respiratory Muscles Physiology Respiratory Airflow Evaluation Respiratory Function Tests Sensitivity and Specificity Reliability and Validity Human Systematic Review PubMed Embase Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Manometry Funding Source Test-Retest Reliability Interrater Reliability Checklists Confidence Intervals Descriptive Statistics Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Physiopathology Concurrent Validity Male Female Male Female ab: Background: Maximal respiratory pressure is used to assess the inspiratory and expiratory muscles strength by using maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax ) and maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax). This study aimed to summarize and evaluate the reliability and validity of maximal respiratory pressure measurements. Methods: This systematic review followed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) recommendations and was reported by using the PRISMA checklist. Studies published before March 2023 were searched in PubMed and EMBASE databases. Results: A total of 642 studies were identified by using the online search strategy and manual search (602 and 40, respectively). Twenty-three studies were included. The level of evidence for test-retest reliability was moderate for PImax and PEmax (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.70 for both), inter-rater reliability was low for PImax and very low for PEmax (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.70 for both), and the measurement error was very low for PImax and PEmax. In addition, concurrent validity presented a high level of evidence for PImax and PEmax (r > 0.80). Conclusions: Only concurrent validity of maximal respiratory pressure measured with the manometers evaluated in this review presented a high level of evidence. The quality of clinical studies by using maximal respiratory pressure would be improved if more high-quality studies on measurement properties, by following well established guidelines and the COSMIN initiative, were available. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|