Rationalizing the Influence of Co‐Design on Distress, Clinical Decision‐Making and Disease Self‐Management of Cancer Patients‐as‐Partners: A Quasi‐Experimental Study.

Introduction: Cancer is regarded as a major worldwide burden. Patient distress has been linked to disease progression. Studies show that engagement strategies affect clinical decision‐making and patient outcomes. The optimal engagement method is a partnership that integrates the patient's expertise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 1 - 13
Autores principales: Alrayshouni, Zahraa, Dayekh, Alaa, El‐Tassi, Ahmad, Pakai, Annamária
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178131491&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178131491
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 27
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178131491
        178131491
        178131491
        10.1111/hex.14113
        178131491
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Rationalizing the Influence of Co‐Design on Distress, Clinical Decision‐Making and Disease Self‐Management of Cancer Patients‐as‐Partners: A Quasi‐Experimental Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Alrayshouni, Zahraa
          Dayekh, Alaa
          El‐Tassi, Ahmad
          Pakai, Annamária
        affil: Patients Affairs Department, Saint George Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychological Distress Prevention and Control
          Decision Making, Clinical
          Self-Management
          Neoplasms Prevention and Control
          Cancer Patients
          Collaboration
          Disease Management
          Patient-Reported Outcomes
          Human
          Quasi-Experimental Studies
          Quantitative Studies
          Lebanese Persons
          Hospitalization
          Teamwork
          Prospective Studies
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Multimethod Studies
          Academic Medical Centers
          Experimental Studies
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Paired T-Tests
          Analysis of Variance
          Chi Square Test
          Extended Family
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Questionnaires
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Lebanon
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Quality Improvement
          Patient Attitudes
          Clinical Trials
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: Cancer is regarded as a major worldwide burden. Patient distress has been linked to disease progression. Studies show that engagement strategies affect clinical decision‐making and patient outcomes. The optimal engagement method is a partnership that integrates the patient's expertise into the comprehensive co‐design of the healthcare system. Objectives: This is the first study to investigate cancer patient‐as‐partner experience and its impact on distress levels, decision‐making and self‐management. Methods: It is a quantitative and quasi‐experimental study that adopted a partnership committee at a Lebanese hospital. A stratified random sampling approach was used, and data were collected by self‐administered questionnaires. We utilized the standardized distress thermometer and PPEET. Results: We recruited 100 patient partners. Cancer patients‐as‐partners had optimal engagement experience in QI projects (mean = 4; SD = 0.4). The main partnership benefit was improved hospitalization experience (49%). Almost half of PP reported no challenges faced (49%). Recommendations for improvement were training (19%), team dynamics management (12%) and proper time allocation (7%). The distress level post‐partnership was significantly reduced (t = 12.57, p < 0.0001). This study highlights the importance of partnership and ‎its ability to influence shared decision‐making preference [χ2(2) = 13.81, p = 0.025] and self‐management practices [F(3, 11.87) = 7.294, p = 0.005]. Conclusion: Research findings suggest that partners from disadvantaged groups can have optimal partnership experience. A partnership model of care can shape the healthcare system into a people‐oriented culture. Further research is needed to explore diverse PP engagement methodologies and their effect on organizational development. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients and family members were engaged in the co‐design of the study methodology, especially the modification of a research instrument. Patient partners with lived experience were involved in the patient partnership committee as core members to improve healthcare system design and evaluation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N