Comparison of three calibration procedures for free-field reference speech audiometry.
In standards IEC 60645-1 and ANSI S3.6, the free-field equivalent earphone output level method is assumed as the reference for speech audiometry. Three calibration procedures for this method were compared in this study. Speech audiometry was conducted with Dutch consonant-vowel-consonant words for t...
| Published in: | International Journal of Audiology Vol. 63; no. 7; pp. 527 - 535 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2024
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178152359&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 178152359 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14992027 JW2 jtl: International Journal of Audiology issn: 14992027 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 63 iid: 7 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 178152359 163630564 178152359 178152359 10.1080/14992027.2023.2208288 178152359 ppf: 527 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparison of three calibration procedures for free-field reference speech audiometry. aug: au: Janssens-bij de Vaate, Mieke Rhebergen, Koenraad S. affil: Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands sug: subj: Calibration Methods Audiometry, Speech Human Male Female Adult Transducers Speech Intelligibility Speech Reception Threshold Test Comparative Studies Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance Speech Perception Descriptive Statistics Netherlands Consonants Vowels Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: In standards IEC 60645-1 and ANSI S3.6, the free-field equivalent earphone output level method is assumed as the reference for speech audiometry. Three calibration procedures for this method were compared in this study. Speech audiometry was conducted with Dutch consonant-vowel-consonant words for the following conditions: 1. TDH39 earphones, 2. loudspeaker, and 3. free-field simulated with TDH39 earphones. The first calibration procedure was based on the empirically determined difference between the speech recognition threshold (SRT) with earphones and a loudspeaker. The second procedure was based on the theoretical free-field correction, derived from the known speech spectrum and the free-field to coupler difference. The third calibration procedure corresponded to the results of the free-field simulated speech material under earphones. The sample included 20 normal hearing subjects. The differences between the observed SRT in the free-field and earphone conditions and the free-field and simulated free-field conditions were 7.1 dB and 0.6 dB, respectively. The three calibration procedures for the free-field equivalent output method yielded approximately the same results, and therefore all appear to be useful for TDH39 earphones. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|