Comparison of discovery rates and prognostic utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA in prostate cancer—a cross-sectional study.

Background: Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron-emission tomography (PET) enable minimal-invasive prostate cancer (PCa) detection and survival prognostication. The present study aims to compare their tumor discovery abilities and prognostic val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging Vol. 51; no. 9; pp. 2833 - 2843
Autores principales: Kluge, Kilian, Einspieler, Holger, Haberl, David, Spielvogel, Clemens, Amereller, Dominik, Egger, Gerda, Kramer, Gero, Grubmüller, Bernhard, Shariat, Shahrokh, Hacker, Marcus, Kenner, Lukas, Haug, Alexander
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron-emission tomography (PET) enable minimal-invasive prostate cancer (PCa) detection and survival prognostication. The present study aims to compare their tumor discovery abilities and prognostic values. Methods: One hundred thirty men with confirmed PCa (70.5 ± 8.0 years) who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (184.8 ± 19.7 MBq) imaging and plasma sample collection (March 2019–August 2021) were included. Plasma-extracted cell-free DNA was subjected to whole-genome-based ctDNA analysis. PSMA-positive tumor lesions were delineated and their quantitative parameters extracted. ctDNA and PSMA PET/CT discovery rates were compared, and the prognostic value for overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Results: PSMA PET discovery rates according to castration status and PSA ranges did differ significantly (P = 0.013, P < 0.001), while ctDNA discovery rates did not (P = 0.311, P = 0.123). ctDNA discovery rates differed between localized and metastatic disease (P = 0.013). Correlations between ctDNA concentrations and PSMA-positive tumor volume (PSMA-TV) were significant in all (r = 0.42, P < 0.001) and castration-resistant (r = 0.65, P < 0.001), however not in hormone-sensitive patients (r = 0.15, P = 0.249). PSMA-TV and ctDNA levels were associated with survival outcomes in the Logrank (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.0023, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: These findings suggest that PSMA PET imaging outperforms ctDNA analysis in detecting prostate cancer across the whole spectrum of disease, while both modalities are independently highly prognostic for survival outcomes.