Getting tense about the atonement.
This paper argues for the coherence of penal substitutionary theories of atonement (PSA) with presentism. After summarizing both the PSA and presentism, we address two major objections to the coherence of these two doctrines working together, namely that (1) there is no reality of the future sins th...
| Publicado en: | International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Vol. 95; no. 3; pp. 273 - 285 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=178333209&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 178333209 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00207047 IPH jtl: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion issn: 00207047 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2024 vid: 95 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 178333209 10.1007/s11153-023-09899-6 ppf: 273 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 553KB tig: atl: Getting tense about the atonement. aug: au: Hollingsworth, Andrew Mullins, R. T. affil: https://ror.org/01qqfah13 Brewton-Parker College, Mt. Vernon, GA, USA https://ror.org/00kgrkn83 University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland su: Atonement Presentism (Philosophy) Philosophy of time Sin Sacrifice sug: subj: Atonement Presentism (Philosophy) Philosophy of time Sin Sacrifice keyword: Penal substitutionary atonement Presentism ab: This paper argues for the coherence of penal substitutionary theories of atonement (PSA) with presentism. After summarizing both the PSA and presentism, we address two major objections to the coherence of these two doctrines working together, namely that (1) there is no reality of the future sins that are atoned for, and (2) that since the past no longer exists, there no longer exists anything for which atonement is needed. We demonstrate that these objections are easily overcome by the PSA-affirming presentist. Lastly, we further argue that PSA seems to require presentism in order for such an atonement to obtain. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved. item: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|