Are Works of Art Affective Artifacts? If Not, What Sort of Artifacts Are They?

Works of art are usually meant to elicit psychological effects from their audiences whereas paradigmatic technical artifacts such as hammers or cars are rather meant to produce physical effects when used. This suggests that works of art and technical artifacts are sharply different entities. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 737 - 747
Main Author: Terrone, Enrico
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Aug2024
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=178445156&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 178445156
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01677411
        NM2
      jtl: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
      issn: 01677411
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 43
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178445156
        10.1007/s11245-024-10045-8
      ppf: 737
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 631KB
      tig:
        atl: Are Works of Art Affective Artifacts? If Not, What Sort of Artifacts Are They?
      aug:
        au: Terrone, Enrico
        affil: https://ror.org/0107c5v14 Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Balbi 4, 16126, Genova, Italy
      su:
        Affect (Psychology)
        Cognitive development
        Experiential learning
      sug:
        subj:
          Affect (Psychology)
          Cognitive development
          Experiential learning
      keyword:
        Art
        Artifact
        Experience
        Function
        Technology
      ab: Works of art are usually meant to elicit psychological effects from their audiences whereas paradigmatic technical artifacts such as hammers or cars are rather meant to produce physical effects when used. This suggests that works of art and technical artifacts are sharply different entities. However, recent developments in the cognitive sciences and the philosophy of technology have individuated special artifacts, namely cognitive and affective artifacts, which also generate psychological effects. In particular, affective artifacts, which have the capacity to alter the affective condition of agents, seem to share crucial features with works of art. Can we subsume works of art under that kind? I will argue that we cannot. Still, comparing art with affective artifacts will help us to clarify the relationship between art and technology, and to introduce a new category, namely the experiential artifact, which can properly encompass works of art.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N