Comparison of intelligibility measures for children with velopharyngeal insufficiency: visual analog scale ratings, interval scales, and orthographic transcription (OT)-based measures.

Regardless of the underlying cause for speech impairment in speakers with cleft palate, a universal consequence of cleft palate is reduced speech intelligibility. Still, there is no standardised approach for measuring intelligibility for speakers with cleft speech. The current study aimed to determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Vol. 38; no. 6; pp. 568 - 587
Autores principales: Hashemi Hosseinabad, Hedieh, Bai, Xiuqin, Washington, Karla
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd 2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178530513&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178530513
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02699206
        B6X
      jtl: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
      issn: 02699206
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2024
      vid: 38
      iid: 6
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178530513
        164553748
        178530513
        178530513
        10.1080/02699206.2023.2227987
        178530513
      ppf: 568
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of intelligibility measures for children with velopharyngeal insufficiency: visual analog scale ratings, interval scales, and orthographic transcription (OT)-based measures.
      aug:
        au:
          Hashemi Hosseinabad, Hedieh
          Bai, Xiuqin
          Washington, Karla
        affil: Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, College of Health and Public Service, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Cleft Palate
          Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
          Speech Intelligibility Evaluation
          Speech Articulation Tests Evaluation
          Visual Analog Scaling
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Child
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Speech-Language Pathologists
          Speech and Language Assessment
          Audiorecording
          Judgment
          Speech Sample
          Random Sample
          Intrarater Reliability
          Interrater Reliability
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Multivariate Analysis of Variance
          Descriptive Statistics
          Univariate Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Speech Discrimination Tests
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Regardless of the underlying cause for speech impairment in speakers with cleft palate, a universal consequence of cleft palate is reduced speech intelligibility. Still, there is no standardised approach for measuring intelligibility for speakers with cleft speech. The current study aimed to determine the relationship between orthographic transcription (OT)-based measures, interval-scale ratings, and visual analog scale (VAS) ratings for perceptual judgements of intelligibility in speakers with cleft palate as judged by speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The speaker participants were six speakers with velopharyngeal insufficiency secondary to cleft palate. Four sets of sentences from the Hearing in Noise Test were recorded from each speaker. A total of 14 SLPs provided their intelligibility judgement on these speaker's recordings by word-by-word orthographic transcriptions, a visual analog scale (0–100), and a 5-point interval rating scale. A Spearman rank correlation test indicated a negative, strong correlation between OT-based measurements and VAS scores (r = −.94; p = 0.01) and between OT-based measurements and interval rating scores (r = −.77, p = 0.01). A strong, positive correlation was found between scores obtained from VAS and interval rating scales (r =.83, p = 0.05). The strong relationship between the objective measure of intelligibility (i.e. OT-based measure) and a subjective measure of intelligibility (i.e. VAS and interval scale) supports using a less time-consuming VAS as a substitute for orthographic transcription in measuring intelligibility in cleft palate speech.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N