Evaluation of the efficacy of inter‐dental brush and dental floss for peri‐implant mucositis: A crossover randomized clinical trial.

Objectives: To evaluate the most effective method for mechanical inter‐dental plaque removal between inter‐dental brushes (IDB) and dental floss (DF), in addition to toothbrushing in patients affected by peri‐implant mucositis (PIM); to identify possible factors related to the patient or to the sing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 779 - 789
Autores principales: Bevilacqua, Lorenzo, Lorenzon, Maria Giulia, Bjedov, Marianna, Costantinides, Fulvia, Angerame, Daniele, Maglione, Michele
Formato: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178558339&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178558339
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        16015029
        K8M
      jtl: International Journal of Dental Hygiene
      issn: 16015029
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 22
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178558339
        176023726
        178558339
        178558339
        10.1111/idh.12793
        178558339
      ppf: 779
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of the efficacy of inter‐dental brush and dental floss for peri‐implant mucositis: A crossover randomized clinical trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
          Lorenzon, Maria Giulia
          Bjedov, Marianna
          Costantinides, Fulvia
          Angerame, Daniele
          Maglione, Michele
        affil: Clinical Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Health, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Mucositis Prevention and Control
          Peri-Implantitis Prevention and Control
          Oral Hygiene
          Toothbrushes
          Dental Floss
          Dental Plaque Prevention and Control
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Crossover Design
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Data Analysis Software
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Descriptive Statistics
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objectives: To evaluate the most effective method for mechanical inter‐dental plaque removal between inter‐dental brushes (IDB) and dental floss (DF), in addition to toothbrushing in patients affected by peri‐implant mucositis (PIM); to identify possible factors related to the patient or to the single implant‐supported element that could influence plaque accumulation and inflammation of peri‐implant tissues. Methods: Forty patients with PIM were recruited. They were randomly assigned to two different groups depending on inter‐dental device used (IDB or DF). At baseline (T0), interproximal area (IA), interproximal emergence angle of the implant crown (A°) and manual dexterity (evaluated with Purdue Pegboard) have been recorded. At 14 days (T1), the inter‐dental cleaning devices have been inverted between groups. After 14 days (T2), the Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) have been recorded. A questionnaire has been submitted to a patient for the analysis of preferences at T0, T1 and T2. Results: Both inter‐dental cleaning devices were effective in reducing PI and GI in the inter‐dental area after 14 days of use. GI reduction was influenced by manual dexterity of the dominant hand. No significant differences were found for PI and GI at the variation of IA and A°. Conclusion: IDB was the most effective method for inter‐dental plaque removal in all subjects regardless of their manual dexterity. DF seems to be more effective than IDB only in subjects with good dexterity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N