The Hope of Agreement: Against Vibing Accounts of Aesthetic Judgment.
Stanley Cavell's account of aesthetic judgment has two components. The first is a feeling: the judge has to see, hear, or 'dig' something in the object being judged; there has to be an 'emotion' that the judge feels and expresses. The second is the 'discipline of accounting for [the judgment]', a re...
| Publicado en: | Mind (0026-4423) Vol. 133; no. 531; pp. 742 - 761 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Jul2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=178608381&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 178608381 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00264423 MND jtl: Mind (0026-4423) issn: 00264423 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 133 iid: 531 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 178608381 10.1093/mind/fzad055 ppf: 742 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 377KB tig: atl: The Hope of Agreement: Against Vibing Accounts of Aesthetic Judgment. aug: au: Hansen, Nat Adams, Zed affil: University of Reading , UK New School for Social Research , USA su: Aesthetic judgment Cavell, Stanley, 1926-2018 Emotions Riggle, Nick Individuality sug: subj: Aesthetic judgment Cavell, Stanley, 1926-2018 Emotions Riggle, Nick Individuality ab: Stanley Cavell's account of aesthetic judgment has two components. The first is a feeling: the judge has to see, hear, or 'dig' something in the object being judged; there has to be an 'emotion' that the judge feels and expresses. The second is the 'discipline of accounting for [the judgment]', a readiness to argue for one's aesthetic judgment in the face of disagreement. The discipline of accounting for one's aesthetic judgments involves what Nick Riggle has called a norm of convergence: the judge aims to get one's audience to taste, see, or hear what the judge tastes or sees or hears in the object being judged. Because of the unmistakable difficulty in reaching agreement in aesthetic judgment, Riggle has denied that aesthetic judgment requires a convergence norm and has proposed instead that it requires 'a kind of harmony of individuality' (which Riggle calls 'vibing'). We argue that Cavell offers a version of the convergence norm that is distinct from those that Riggle criticizes, namely Kant's demand for agreement and Andy Egan's presupposition of similarity in dispositions in 'non-defective' aesthetic conversations. Cavell's version of the convergence norm is 'the hope of agreement'. One can hope that one's audience will agree with one's aesthetic judgments even when one isn't in a position to demand agreement or to presuppose similarity in the dispositions that would make agreement more likely. Cavell's distinct convergence norm avoids Riggle's criticisms and contributes to a richer account of what's going on when we disagree about aesthetic matters. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: © 2019 Mind Association. item: Mind (0026-4423) holder: Oxford University Press / USA dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|