Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice, and Antiracism Statements by Clinical Psychological Science Programs: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Public Commitments.

Clinical psychological science is long overdue to incorporate antiracism and social justice as core principles. To evaluate the current state of clinical science training programs' public-facing statements on antiracism and diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (ADEIJ), we formed a workgroup und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Training & Education in Professional Psychology Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 183 - 194
Autores principales: Rajesh, Aishwarya, Zhang, Ke Anne, Kelly, Chris, Aguilar Silvan, Yesenia, Diehl, Caroline K., Obee, Averill F., Wilson, Maria K., Perez, Vanesa, Howard, Erica, Kang, Sungha, Duong, Jacqueline B., Weiss, Hannah, Sayegh, Philip, South, Susan C., Manczak, Erika M., Merchant, Jaisal T., Merrill, Brittany M., Eaton, Nicholas R.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Psychological Association Aug2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178657367&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178657367
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19313918
        306L
      jtl: Training & Education in Professional Psychology
      issn: 19313918
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2023
      vid: 18
      iid: 3
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
      place: Washington, District of Columbia
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178657367
        178657367
        178657367
        10.1037/tep0000452
        178657367
      ppf: 183
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice, and Antiracism Statements by Clinical Psychological Science Programs: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Public Commitments.
      aug:
        au:
          Rajesh, Aishwarya
          Zhang, Ke Anne
          Kelly, Chris
          Aguilar Silvan, Yesenia
          Diehl, Caroline K.
          Obee, Averill F.
          Wilson, Maria K.
          Perez, Vanesa
          Howard, Erica
          Kang, Sungha
          Duong, Jacqueline B.
          Weiss, Hannah
          Sayegh, Philip
          South, Susan C.
          Manczak, Erika M.
          Merchant, Jaisal T.
          Merrill, Brittany M.
          Eaton, Nicholas R.
        affil: Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine
      sug:
        subj:
          Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
          Antiracism
          Social Justice
          Coding
          Psychology, Clinical Education
          Counseling Education
          Commitment Evaluation
          Program Evaluation
          Organizational Culture
          Human
          Certified Coding Specialists
          Interrater Reliability
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Conceptual Framework
          Health Inequities
          Curriculum Development
      ab: Clinical psychological science is long overdue to incorporate antiracism and social justice as core principles. To evaluate the current state of clinical science training programs' public-facing statements on antiracism and diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (ADEIJ), we formed a workgroup under the guidance of the Academy of Psychological Clinical Science (APCS) Task Force to Center Racial and Social Justice in Clinical Science. Our workgroup evaluated the public-facing web materials of 78 APCS doctoral and internship programs. Following existing frameworks that have conceptualized the development of multicultural organizations, we evaluated the degree to which materials mentioned inclusivity, acknowledged inequities, and reported planned and enacted actions to promote ADEIJ. We examined rationales for engaging in this work, differentiating between moral and instrumental rationales. Results showed not all programs had ADEIJ statements, but a coding scheme can reliably assess existing statements. While all programs mentioned inclusivity and most acknowledged inequities, some had subtle or implicit exclusionary language, and a minority described concrete actions. Current efforts within our field may represent more symbolic than identity or structural change. Our findings inform recommendations for improving the efforts of training programs. Public Significance Statement: A coding scheme can reliably assess how clearly public-facing statements communicate a program's commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, or antiracist values. The programs assessed showed more indications of symbolic change than identity or structural change, perhaps reflecting a lack of knowledge about how to enact structural change and/or limited willingness to reflect on our field's contributions to historical and current inequities.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N