Non-spatial matters on the possibility of non-spatial material objects.

While there is considerable disagreement on the precise nature of material objecthood, it is standardly assumed that material objects must be spatial. In this paper, I provide two arguments against this assumption. The first argument is made from largely a priori considerations about modal plenitude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 204; no. 2; pp. 1 - 30
Autor principal: Davis, Cruz Austin
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=178670897&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 178670897
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 204
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178670897
        10.1007/s11229-024-04606-y
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 383KB
      tig:
        atl: Non-spatial matters on the possibility of non-spatial material objects.
      aug:
        au: Davis, Cruz Austin
        affil: University of Massachusetts Amherst (Philosophy), Amherst, MA, USA
      sug:
      keyword:
        Emergent spacetime
        Location
        Material object metaphysics
        Modal plenitude
        Nature of materiality
      ab: While there is considerable disagreement on the precise nature of material objecthood, it is standardly assumed that material objects must be spatial. In this paper, I provide two arguments against this assumption. The first argument is made from largely a priori considerations about modal plenitude. The possibility of non-spatial material objects follows from commitment to certain plausible principles governing material objecthood and plausible principles regarding modal plenitude. The second argument draws from current philosophical discussions regarding theories of quantum gravity and the emergence of spacetime. When it is appreciated what possible worlds these current theories commit us to, the possibility of non-spatial material objects will follow. Thus, either route will lead us to the possibility of non-spatial material objects. The significance of this result is that we need to revise our accounts of material objecthood to both accommodate these possibilities and the theories that lead to them.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N