When to Pull the Trigger: Conceptual Considerations for Approximating Head Acceleration Events Using Instrumented Mouthguards.
Head acceleration events (HAEs) are acceleration responses of the head following external short-duration collisions. The potential risk of brain injury from a single high-magnitude HAE or repeated occurrences makes them a significant concern in sport. Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) can approximate...
| Publicado en: | Sports Medicine Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 1361 - 1370 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178678374&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 178678374 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01121642 C5H jtl: Sports Medicine issn: 01121642 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2024 vid: 54 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 178678374 175895342 178678374 178678374 10.1007/s40279-024-02012-5 178678374 ppf: 1361 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: When to Pull the Trigger: Conceptual Considerations for Approximating Head Acceleration Events Using Instrumented Mouthguards. aug: au: Tooby, James Till, Kevin Gardner, Andrew Stokes, Keith Tierney, Gregory Weaving, Daniel Rowson, Steve Ghajari, Mazdak Emery, Carolyn Bussey, Melanie Dawn Jones, Ben affil: https://ror.org/02xsh5r57 Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK sug: subj: Head Physiology Acceleration Mouthguards Utilization Sporting Events Brain Injuries Prevention and Control Athletic Injuries Prevention and Control Kinematics Ground Reaction Force Sensitivity and Specificity ab: Head acceleration events (HAEs) are acceleration responses of the head following external short-duration collisions. The potential risk of brain injury from a single high-magnitude HAE or repeated occurrences makes them a significant concern in sport. Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) can approximate HAEs. The distinction between sensor acceleration events, the iMG datum for approximating HAEs and HAEs themselves, which have been defined as the in vivo event, is made to highlight limitations of approximating HAEs using iMGs. This article explores the technical limitations of iMGs that constrain the approximation of HAEs and discusses important conceptual considerations for stakeholders interpreting iMG data. The approximation of HAEs by sensor acceleration events is constrained by false positives and false negatives. False positives occur when a sensor acceleration event is recorded despite no (in vivo) HAE occurring, while false negatives occur when a sensor acceleration event is not recorded after an (in vivo) HAE has occurred. Various mechanisms contribute to false positives and false negatives. Video verification and post-processing algorithms offer effective means for eradicating most false positives, but mitigation for false negatives is less comprehensive. Consequently, current iMG research is likely to underestimate HAE exposures, especially at lower magnitudes. Future research should aim to mitigate false negatives, while current iMG datasets should be interpreted with consideration for false negatives when inferring athlete HAE exposure. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|