Beyond gatekeeping: Philosophical sources, Indigenous philosophy, and the Huarochirí Manuscript.
This paper argues for a broad definition of philosophical sources and how Indigenous traditional knowledge fits that definition. It concludes by showing how, following the previous two points, an Indigenous document such as the Huarochirí Manuscript can be considered a philosophical source by academ...
| Publicado en: | Metaphilosophy Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 365 - 381 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=178683674&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 178683674 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00261068 9OM jtl: Metaphilosophy issn: 00261068 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 55 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 178683674 10.1111/meta.12695 ppf: 365 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 217KB tig: atl: Beyond gatekeeping: Philosophical sources, Indigenous philosophy, and the Huarochirí Manuscript. aug: au: Sanchez‐Perez, Jorge affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada su: Traditional knowledge Gatekeeping Philosophers Manuscripts Definitions sug: subj: Traditional knowledge Gatekeeping Philosophers Manuscripts Definitions keyword: Andean philosophy Huarochirí Manuscript Indigenous philosophy metaphilosophy philosophical sources ab: This paper argues for a broad definition of philosophical sources and how Indigenous traditional knowledge fits that definition. It concludes by showing how, following the previous two points, an Indigenous document such as the Huarochirí Manuscript can be considered a philosophical source by academic philosophers. The paper has three sections: the first deals with the methodological point of addressing what can be considered as philosophy. This section presents a conversational approach to philosophy. This approach, although broad, properly captures the practices of inquiring about philosophical issues as is commonly done in Western academic circles, but without excluding the practices of non‐Western cultures from being labelled as philosophical. The second section argues for the analytical distinction between a philosophical source, a philosophical text, and a philosophical insight. It shows that what makes a philosophical source such are the philosophical insights that it can provide. The final section shows how the Huarochirí Manuscript has merits making it worthy of being considered a philosophical source and thus a relevant academic source for those working in the field of philosophy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Metaphilosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|