The Lab Discovered: Place-for-Institution Metonyms Appearing in Subject Position Are Processed as Agents.

"Hospital" can refer to a physical place or more figuratively to the people associated with it. Such place-for-institution metonyms are common in everyday language, but there remain several open questions in the literature regarding how they are processed. The goal of the current eyetracking experim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition Vol. 50; no. 7; pp. 1152 - 1167
Main Authors: Lowder, Matthew W., Zhou, Adrian, Gordon, Peter C.
Format: Article
Published: American Psychological Association Jul2024
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=178736234&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 178736234
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02787393
        EXL
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition
      issn: 02787393
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2024
      vid: 50
      iid: 7
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178736234
        10.1037/xlm0001314
      ppf: 1152
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Lab Discovered: Place-for-Institution Metonyms Appearing in Subject Position Are Processed as Agents.
      aug:
        au:
          Lowder, Matthew W.
          Zhou, Adrian
          Gordon, Peter C.
        affil:
          Department of Psychology, University of Richmond
          Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis
          Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
      keyword:
        eyetracking
        garden-path sentences
        metonymy
        sentence processing
        eyetracking
        garden-path sentences
        metonymy
        sentence processing
      ab: "Hospital" can refer to a physical place or more figuratively to the people associated with it. Such place-for-institution metonyms are common in everyday language, but there remain several open questions in the literature regarding how they are processed. The goal of the current eyetracking experiments was to investigate how metonyms are interpreted when they appear as sentence subjects in structures that are temporarily syntactically ambiguous versus unambiguous (e.g., "The hospital [that was] requested by the doctor..."). If comprehenders have a bias to interpret metonyms in subject position as agents (Fishbein & Harris, 2014), they should initially access the figurative (institutional) sense of the metonym. This interpretation is rendered incorrect at the disambiguating by-phrase, which should lead to reanalysis (i.e., garden-path effects). In Experiment 1, larger garden-path effects were observed for metonyms compared to inanimate control nouns that did not have a figurative sense. In Experiment 2, garden-path effects were equivalent for metonyms and animate sentence subjects. In addition, there was some evidence that readers exhibited initial difficulty at the verb (e.g., "requested") when it immediately followed the metonym compared to the inanimate control nouns in Experiment 1. Overall, the results suggest that the subject-as-agent heuristic is a powerful cue during sentence processing, which can prompt the comprehender to access a figurative interpretation of a metonym.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N