Caretakers of value: A theory of human personhood.

According to a traditional view, humans are superior to their non‐human terrestrial companions because they alone are "rational animals." Although the traditional view is presupposed by our social and legal institutions, it has been called into question by modern science: Darwin himself claimed that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Forum Vol. 55; no. 3; pp. 251 - 270
Autor principal: Woodward, Philip
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=178813884&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 178813884
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0031806X
        BS3
      jtl: Philosophical Forum
      issn: 0031806X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 55
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178813884
        10.1111/phil.12370
      ppf: 251
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 173KB
      tig:
        atl: Caretakers of value: A theory of human personhood.
      aug:
        au: Woodward, Philip
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Dunleavy Hall, Niagara University, Lewiston New York, , USA
      su:
        Personality (Theory of knowledge)
        Reasoning
        Abstract thought
        Cognition
        Social institutions
      sug:
        subj:
          Personality (Theory of knowledge)
          Reasoning
          Abstract thought
          Cognition
          Social institutions
      ab: According to a traditional view, humans are superior to their non‐human terrestrial companions because they alone are "rational animals." Although the traditional view is presupposed by our social and legal institutions, it has been called into question by modern science: Darwin himself claimed that humans differ in degree rather than in kind from animals, and recent discoveries in comparative animal cognition have seemed to confirm Darwin's assertion. Sustaining the traditional view in light of these discoveries calls out for a careful comparison of the human mind with its precursors, the vertebrate mind and the mammalian mind. Psychological capacities shared across the animal kingdom are repurposed in humans, rendering humans uniquely capable of rationality. To be rational is to respond appropriately to value. Humans as such are not rational animals, but have the potential to become rational animals. This potential marks a morally relevant difference in kind between humans and non‐human animals.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Forum is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Forum
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N