Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review.
Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the clinical implications of employing various Extended Reality (XR) tools for image guidance in urological surgery. Methods: In June 2023, a systematic electronic literature search was conducted using the Medline database (via PubMed), Embase...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging Vol. 51; no. 10; pp. 3109 - 3135 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178837430&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 178837430 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 16197070 NPC jtl: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging issn: 16197070 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2024 vid: 51 iid: 10 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 178837430 176464174 10.1007/s00259-024-06699-6 178837430 ppf: 3109 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Visual extended reality tools in image-guided surgery in urology: a systematic review. aug: au: Checcucci, Enrico Piana, Alberto Volpi, Gabriele Quarà, Alberto De Cillis, Sabrina Piramide, Federico Burgio, Mariano Meziere, Juliette Cisero, Edoardo Colombo, Marco Bignante, Gabriele Sica, Michele Granato, Stefano Verri, Paolo Gatti, Cecilia Alessio, Paolo Di Dio, Michele Alba, Stefano Fiori, Cristian Amparore, Daniele affil: https://ror.org/04wadq306 Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Strada Provinciale 142, km 3,95, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy sug: ab: Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the clinical implications of employing various Extended Reality (XR) tools for image guidance in urological surgery. Methods: In June 2023, a systematic electronic literature search was conducted using the Medline database (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy was designed based on the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registry number CRD42023449025). We incorporated retrospective and prospective comparative studies, along with single-arm studies, which provided information on the use of XR, Mixed Reality (MR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR) in urological surgical procedures. Studies that were not written in English, non-original investigations, and those involving experimental research on animals or cadavers were excluded from our analysis. The quality assessment of comparative and cohort studies was conducted utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, whilst for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the Jadad scale was adopted. The level of evidence for each study was determined based on the guidelines provided by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Results: The initial electronic search yielded 1,803 papers after removing duplicates. Among these, 58 publications underwent a comprehensive review, leading to the inclusion of 40 studies that met the specified criteria for analysis. 11, 20 and 9 studies tested XR on prostate cancer, kidney cancer and miscellaneous, including bladder cancer and lithiasis surgeries, respectively. Focusing on the different technologies 20, 15 and 5 explored the potential of VR, AR and MR. The majority of the included studies (i.e., 22) were prospective non-randomized, whilst 7 and 11 were RCT and retrospective studies respectively. The included studies that revealed how these new tools can be useful both in preoperative and intraoperative setting for a tailored surgical approach. Conclusions: AR, VR and MR techniques have emerged as highly effective new tools for image-guided surgery, especially for urologic oncology. Nevertheless, the complete clinical advantages of these innovations are still in the process of evaluation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|