Ways to foster the scientific system II: beyond research agendas and targeted funding – trust the scientist!

This article discusses the issue of external selection criteria and their negative influence on scientific research. It argues that instead of investing in research proposals that adhere to pre-planned agendas and milestones, resources should be allocated to support scientists and give them the free...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 167 - 170
Autor principal: Wedel, Marco
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=178880701&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 178880701
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13511610
        IVT
      jtl: Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences
      issn: 13511610
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 37
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178880701
        10.1080/13511610.2024.2380156
      ppf: 167
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 82KB
      tig:
        atl: Ways to foster the scientific system II: beyond research agendas and targeted funding – trust the scientist!
      aug:
        au: Wedel, Marco
        affil: Department of Work/Technology and Participation, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
      su:
        Brain drain
        Machine learning
        Scientific method
        Institutional autonomy
        Research questions
        Promises
        Patient autonomy
      sug:
        subj:
          Brain drain
          Machine learning
          Scientific method
          Institutional autonomy
          Research questions
          Promises
          Patient autonomy
      ab: This article discusses the issue of external selection criteria and their negative influence on scientific research. It argues that instead of investing in research proposals that adhere to pre-planned agendas and milestones, resources should be allocated to support scientists and give them the freedom to pursue their expertise. The article highlights the bureaucratic challenges faced by scientists and the need for a more flexible and agile approach to research. It also raises concerns about the lack of innovation in certain fields, such as AI, due to the disconnect between industry investment and public research agendas. The article calls for a reevaluation of current approaches to research funding and the promotion of innovation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N