Applying the R = MC2 implementation science heuristic to assess the impact of readiness on reach and implementation of a population‐wide genomic screening program.

Population‐wide genomic screening for genes that have high penetrance and clinical actionability enhances the opportunity to identify individuals at risk for developing hereditary conditions. Organizational readiness has been shown to influence the likelihood of successful implementation of complex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Genetic Counseling Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 815 - 822
Autores principales: Allen, Caitlin G., Hunt, Kelly J., Jackson, Amy, Baierl, Joseph, McMahon, Lori L., Judge, Daniel P.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=178974007&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 178974007
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10597700
        41A
      jtl: Journal of Genetic Counseling
      issn: 10597700
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2024
      vid: 33
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        178974007
        178974007
        178974007
        10.1002/jgc4.1775
        178974007
      ppf: 815
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Applying the R = MC2 implementation science heuristic to assess the impact of readiness on reach and implementation of a population‐wide genomic screening program.
      aug:
        au:
          Allen, Caitlin G.
          Hunt, Kelly J.
          Jackson, Amy
          Baierl, Joseph
          McMahon, Lori L.
          Judge, Daniel P.
        affil: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston South Carolina, , USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Implementation Science
          Problem Solving
          Program Implementation
          Genomics
          Genetic Screening
          Human
          Funding Source
          Motivation
          DNA
          Pilot Studies
          Quantitative Studies
          Surveys
          Meetings
          Descriptive Statistics
          Bivariate Statistics
      ab: Population‐wide genomic screening for genes that have high penetrance and clinical actionability enhances the opportunity to identify individuals at risk for developing hereditary conditions. Organizational readiness has been shown to influence the likelihood of successful implementation of complex initiatives such as the integration of population‐wide genomic screening in clinical settings. We use the organizational readiness heuristic R = MC2 to better understand three factors that influence readiness for implementation of In Our DNA SC, a population‐wide genomic screening program: motivation to implement, general capacity of an organization, and innovation‐specific capacities. We then assessed the influence of these readiness factors on implementation outcomes of reach (measured through enrollment rate) and implementation (measured through the number of DNA samples collected). Data were collected pre‐implementation and captured during the three‐month pilot phase of the In Our DNA SC program. We collected administrative data from the electronic health record and quantitatively captured elements of readiness through surveys distributed to provider champions and clinical administrative champions at the 10 sites implementing the population‐wide genomic screening program. We facilitated innovation‐specific capacity through training offered at each site, as well as technical assistance through weekly meetings with other implementing sites, and resources available to all staff. Forty percent of provider champions attended training and 80% of administrative champions attended training. An average of 3.7 additional staff were trained at each implementing site. Satisfaction with training positively influenced reach (β = 0.0121, p = 0.0271) but did not impact implementation. Provider engagement (innovation capabilities) was associated with reach (β = 0.0020, p = 0.0251) and clinical administrator engagement was associated with sample collection rate (β = 0.2599, β = 0.038). Readiness to change is considered one of the most important factors in understanding the potential opportunity for implementation. We found that motivation to adopt a population‐wide genomic screening program positively impacted the program's reach. The type of champion influenced discrete outcomes, with provider champions positively impacting reach and administrative champions influencing implementation (assessed through sample collection rate). As genomics continues to be integrated into clinical practice, it will be important to understand the contextual factors that influence readiness for implementation and design support throughout the life‐course of implementation to ensure the success of large‐scale, complex initiatives.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N