Founding Phenomenological Sociology with Alfred Schütz and Max Scheler.
In this paper we want to re-examine the traditional belief that phenomenological sociology owes its pedigree primarily to Alfred Schütz. More specifically, we will try to show that Max Scheler is equally worthy of the title of founder of phenomenological sociology. Our argument has three interlockin...
| Publicado en: | Studia Phaenomenologica Vol. 24; pp. 59 - 80 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Zeta Books
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179011488&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 179011488 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15825647 8XIP jtl: Studia Phaenomenologica issn: 15825647 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2024 vid: 24 pid: 71195 pub: Zeta Books artinfo: ui: 179011488 10.5840/studphaen2024244 ppf: 59 ppct: 21 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 4.8MB tig: atl: Founding Phenomenological Sociology with Alfred Schütz and Max Scheler. aug: au: Frère, Bruno Laoureux, Sébastien affil: Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique University of Liège University of Namur su: Phenomenological sociology Social context Phenomenology Sociology Intersubjectivity Capitalism sug: subj: Phenomenological sociology Social context Phenomenology Sociology Intersubjectivity Capitalism keyword: capitalism culture Ego frames of mind intentionality intersubjectivity phenomenological sociology society Transcendantal ab: In this paper we want to re-examine the traditional belief that phenomenological sociology owes its pedigree primarily to Alfred Schütz. More specifically, we will try to show that Max Scheler is equally worthy of the title of founder of phenomenological sociology. Our argument has three interlocking themes. First of all, we will recognize, like many others before us, the undoubtedly essential contribution made by Schütz, who is generally viewed as the father of phenomenological sociology. Our second step, however, will be to return to the foundations of this approach and to show that it throws up certain difficulties. As is widely known, Schütz's project is nothing less than to apply the Husserlian transcendental to the empirical. But, we will show that because Schütz remains caught in a king of egologic sociology, reducing intersubjectivity--and the social--to a face-to-face relationship, he fails to give to phenomenology a real sociological dimension. Nevertheless this does not mean that phenomenology does not have a powerful sociological dimension. By exploring concepts insufficiently explored by Schütz in a third step, such as Husserl's notion of intentionality and its equivalent in Max Scheler's thought (the frame of mind), we will explore the empirical potential of phenomenology. Scheler, considering a social environment independent (and even constitutive) of the subject, gives the final form to a phenomenological sociology, a sociology which gives us even the mean to think a sympathetic relationship with the natural world, critical of capitalism and prefiguring ecology. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Studia Phaenomenologica is the property of Zeta Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Studia Phaenomenologica holder: Zeta Books dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|