Realism and the detection of dark matter.
A number of philosophers claim that realism about dark matter in cosmology is unwarranted because there has been no empirical confirmation of a dark matter particle. This demand is misguided. I argue that we should take the theoretical concept of dark matter as described in our best cosmological mod...
| Published in: | Synthese Vol. 204; no. 3; pp. 1 - 19 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Sep2024
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| Summary: | A number of philosophers claim that realism about dark matter in cosmology is unwarranted because there has been no empirical confirmation of a dark matter particle. This demand is misguided. I argue that we should take the theoretical concept of dark matter as described in our best cosmological model (ΛCDM) at face value. Since there is no theoretical or nomological requirement that dark matter be a particle, we should better assess the implications of dark matter detection via gravitational lensing. The result is that realism about dark matter is a viable position. |
|---|