Comparison of misfit and roughness of CAD-CAM ZrO, selective laser sintered CoCr and preformed Ti implant abutment crowns.

Background: Marginal misfit and surface roughness of customized implant abutments is critical for restorative success. However, little is known about the comparison of misfit and surface roughness of CAD-CAM Zirconium oxide (ZrO), selective laser melting (SLM) Cobalt Chrome (CoCr) and preformed abut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Oral Health Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
Autores principales: Vohra, Fahim, Alsaif, Rawan, Khan, Rawaiz, Bukhari, Ishfaq A
Formato: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 8/25/2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=179257906&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 179257906
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14726831
        1CIC
      jtl: BMC Oral Health
      issn: 14726831
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 8/25/2024
      vid: 24
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179257906
        179257906
        179257906
        10.1186/s12903-024-04735-3
        179257906
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of misfit and roughness of CAD-CAM ZrO, selective laser sintered CoCr and preformed Ti implant abutment crowns.
      aug:
        au:
          Vohra, Fahim
          Alsaif, Rawan
          Khan, Rawaiz
          Bukhari, Ishfaq A
        affil: https://ror.org/02f81g417 Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Kingdom of Saudia Arabia, 12485 - 6541, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
      sug:
        subj:
          Dental Implants
          Dental Abutments
          Crowns
          Titanium
          Computer-Aided Design
          Dental Implantation
          Materials Testing
          Laser Therapy
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Methylmethacrylates
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Descriptive Statistics
          Funding Source
      ab: Background: Marginal misfit and surface roughness of customized implant abutments is critical for restorative success. However, little is known about the comparison of misfit and surface roughness of CAD-CAM Zirconium oxide (ZrO), selective laser melting (SLM) Cobalt Chrome (CoCr) and preformed abutments. The aim of the study is to investigate the relation of misfit and micro-roughness of selective laser melting (SLM), preformed and CAD-CAM implant abutments. Methods: Thirty internal connection, endosseous dental implants (Ø 4.0 mm x 10 mm, Dentium) were mounted in Polymethyl methacrylate vertically. Ten preformed Titanium alloy (Ti) abutments with 1 mm soft tissue height and Ø 4.5 mm were included as controls. Ten each of Y-TZP and SLM-CoCr, abutment/crowns were fabricated using CAD-CAM milling (CAD-CAM-ZrO) and SLM techniques. Surface micro-roughness (Ra) of the fabricated implant abutment/crown was evaluated with a 3D optical non-contact microscope. All implant restorations were torqued to implants (30 Ncm) using a Tohnichi BTGE digital torque gauge and were analyzed with Bruker micro-CT (Skyscan 1173) to detect micro-gaps at pre-selected points at implant abutment interface. The Ra and misfit data were compared using ANOVA, Tukey-Kramer, Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson correlation (p < 0.05). Results: Mean Ra among SLM CoCr abutments [0.88 (0.09) µm] were lower than CAD-CAM-ZrO and higher than preformed Ti abutments. Horizontal misfit among SLM-CoCr [45.43 (9.41) µm] and preformed Ti [36.87 (13.23) µm] abutments was not statistically different (p > 0.05). Misfit was significantly higher in Y-TZP samples compared to SLM-CoCr (p = 0.031) and preformed Ti abutments (p = 0.01). Preformed Ti abutments showed significantly lower misfit compared to SLM-CoCr abutments (p = 0.01). A positive linear correlation was observed between the surface roughness (Ra) and vertical misfit (r = 0.61, p < 0.05). Conclusion: SLM CoCr abutments showed rough surface compared to preformed Ti abutments, while horizontal misfit was comparable among SLM-CoCr and preformed abutments. Misfit was significantly greater in Y-TZP abutments, compared to SLM and preformed abutments. SLM abutment fabrication technique needs further improvement to provide better fit and surface topography.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N